Guwahati Court January 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nibaran G. MomIn Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-07-1999
J.N. Sarma, J.1. This writ application has been filed by the Secretary, Garo Hills, Member Contractor and Veneer cum Saw Mill Owner Association. The grievances of the petitioner-association are:(1) Illegal and arbitrary use of power Under Section 44 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 and rules 42, 43(7)(j) of the Assam General Sales Tax Rules, 1993.(2) Illegal process of demanding security deposit for each consignment from the member mills of the petitioner-association inspite of having all valid documents and even after payment of duties.2. It is claimed that the mills have the valid permit/permission Under Rule 10 of the Transit Rules framed by the Government of Assam under sections 40 and 41 of the Assam Forest Regulation, 1891 and the Garo Hills Forest Act, 1968. The petitioners claimed to have also the certificate of registration issued under the Meghalaya Purchase Act read with rule 39 for purchasing logs after payment of royalty as per Meghalaya Government Schedule. They ...
Dulu Sutradhar Vs. State of Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-06-1999
P.C. Phukan, J.1. By the judgment and order dated 4-8-95 passed in Sessions Case No. 52/94, learned Sessions Judge, Cachar at Silchar convicted the accused Dulu Sutradhar and Naru Das under Section 302/34, IPC and sentenced them hereunder to imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of Rs. 2000/- each, in default, to further two month's R.I.2. The accused Dulu Sutradhar filed Criminal Appeal No. 191(J)/95 and the accused Naru Das filed Criminal Appeal No. 199/95 against their conviction and sentence as aforesaid.3. By an order dated 8-7-96 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 191(J)/95, this Court directed, 'this appeal will be connected with Criminal Appeal No. 199/95 and will be listed together for hearing'. Accordingly., it is proposed to dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 191 (J)/95 and Criminal Appeal No. 199/95 by this common judgment after hearing both the appeals listed together.4. Considered the record of the case and heard Mrs. J. Bora, learned counsel appearing as the Amicus Curiae f...
Shri J.S.L. Vasava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-05-1999
1. Both the original applications (O.A. No. 2257 96 and O.A. No. 16/98) involve common questions of law and similar facts; therefore, we propose to dispose of both the applications by a common order. The facts are: Before filing of original application No. 225/96, the applicant was Secretary to the Government of Assam, Agricultural Department. In the month of August, 1995 the applicant was promoted to the supertime scale of Indian Administrative Service (IAS for short) by Annexure I Notification dated 22.8.1995. He took over charge of the supertime scale as per Annexure 2 letter dated 23.8.1995. A year thereafter, i.e.on 24.5.1996 the Accountant General (A and E), Meghalaya, etc., Shillong-3rd respondent informed the applicant by Annexure 9 letter enclosing Annexure 10 D.O. letter dated 19.1.1996 that the applicant was promoted before the completion of his sixteen years of service as prescribed. By Annexures 11 and 12 the applicant had been issued pay slips only in respect of Selectio...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›