Guwahati Court April 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thounaojam Lukhoi Singh Vs. District Magistrate and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Apr-15-1996
H.K. Sema, J.1. Shri Thounaojam Lukhpi Singh alias Surajkumar alias Ibotomba, son of late Th. Tomba Singh, Singjamei Makha Kakwa Huidrom Leikai, P. S. Singjamei, imphal District, Manipur was detained by an order dated 22nd November, 1995 by the District Magistrate, Imphal, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 3 read with Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980, hereinafter, 'the Act'. Thereafter, the detenu has been furnished with grounds of detention by an order dated 25th November, 1995, The order of detention has been approved by the appropriate Government by an order dated 4-12-1995. The order of detention has been assailed in this writ petition on the following grounds :(a) Vital documents relied upon by the detaining authority on the basis of which the detaining authority derived satisfaction were not supplied to the detenu in Manipuri rendering;(b) Copies of police report which formed the basis of grounds of detention were not supplied to th...
Bajrangi Singh Vs. State of Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Apr-11-1996
B.N. Singh Neelam, J.1. The sole accused-appellant Bajrangi Singh preferred this appeal Under Section 374 Cr. P.C. read with Section 36(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 23-2-94 passed by the learned Special Judge, Cachar, Silchar in Special Case No. 13(A)/1991 convicting the sole accused-appellant named above Under Section 18 read with Section 8(e) of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985 and sentencing him to undergo RI for 10 years and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- in default to suffer RI for further period of 5 years.2. This will not be out of place to mention that this Criminal Appeal was disposed of by this Court on 15-6-95 looking into the material so available on record in absence of the appellant's lawyer because no one represented the appellant for last two consecutive dates as a result of which the matter was taken up, the learned Public Prosecutor was heard and the appeal was dismissed. Against the ...
Sudhangshu Bikash Dutta Vs. Ranesh Kumar Chakraborty and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Apr-03-1996
N.S. Singh, J. 1. A prayer has been made by Shri N. Majumder learned Advocate for and on behalf of the appellant for adjournment of the case for week. I have heard Shri N. Majumder, learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This second appeal was admitted on 20-5-1982. No steps was taken by the appellant for service of notice upon the respondents for a long time after the case was admitted. By an order dated 19-7-1993 this Court made the following observations: 'Records indicate that since 1982 the appellant did not take steps to deposit Talabana. Office note dated 16-7-1993 also indicate that Talabana has not been filed. Learned counsel submits that he has taken steps and deposited the Talabana. Office is directed to enquire and report by tomorrow. List this case tommorrow.'' On the same day i.e.-19-7-1993 the office made a report that on scrutiny the matter has been checked and found that Talabana has not been filed till today (19-7-1993). On 20-7-1993 the appeal was dismissed on the ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›