Guwahati Court August 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Takhelmayum Ibochou Singh Vs. State of Manipur and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-12-1993
H.K. Homchaudhury, J.1. Apprehending arrest in connection with FIR No. 29(6) 93 of Ukhrul P.S. under Sections 20(b)(i) and Section 60(3) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as No. ND & PS Act), the petitioner has approached this Court on 17th July, 1993 in this petition under Section 438, Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. On 19-7-93 notice was issued to the State and the learned Public Prosecutor accepted the notice. An interim order was passed on 19-7-93 to the effect that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he should be allowed to go on interim bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already been enlarged on interim bail as ordered by the Court on 19-7-93. Interim order on 19-7-93 was passed because of the fact that the petitioner was not named as accused in the FIR. Learned Public Prosecutor has pro...
income-tax Officer Vs. Sunanda Ram Deka and Others.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-04-1993
S. N. PHUKAN J. - This appeal has been filed by the complainant-appellant, viz., Income-tax Officer, A-Ward, Tezpur, against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darrang at Mangaldoi in C.R. Case No. 1354 of 1985. By the impugned judgment and order, the accused-firm and its partners were found not guilty of the charge under section 276C and section 277 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.The accused-respondent No. 1 is the partnership-firm, viz., Sunandaram Deka. The firm had partners, viz., Sunandaram Deka, Promode Chandra Deka, Mukul Chandra Deka, Sanjeeb Kumar Deka and Rajib Kumar Deka and the late Kulen Deka. All the other partners were sons of Shri Sunandaram Deka.The prosecution was started under the aforesaid sections for the assessment year 1981-82. The partnership firm filed the first return on April 3, 1982, which was marked as exhibit-1 and duly signed and verified by its partner, Sunandaram Deka. In the return, the total income was s...
income-tax Officer Vs. Sunanda Ram Deka and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-04-1993
S.N. Phukan, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the complainant-appellant, viz., Income-tax Officer, A-Ward, Tezpur, against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darrang at Mangaldoi in C. R. Case No. 1354 of 1985. By the impugned judgment and order, the accused-firm and its partners were found not guilty of the charge under Section 276C and Section 277 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. The accused-respondent No. 1 is the partnership-firm, viz., Sunanda-ram Deka. The firm had partners, viz., Sunandaram Deka, Promode Chandra Deka, Mukul Chandra Deka, Sanjeeb Kumar Deka and Rajib Kumar Deka and the late Kulen Deka. All the other partners were sons of Shri Sunandaram Deka.3. The prosecution was started under the aforesaid sections for the assessment year 1981-82. The partnership firm filed the first return on April 3, 1982, which was marked as exhibit-1 and duly signed and verified by its partner, Sunandaram Deka. In the return, the total inc...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›