Guwahati Court September 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Heramba Kumar Sarma and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Sep-07-1989
A. Raghuvir, C.J. 1. The State Government of Assam on July 7, 1989 promulgated Rules for Admission to the 356 seats of First Year M.B.B.S. and B.D.S. Courses at Dibrugarh, Gauhati and at Silchar Medical Colleges. The earlier Rules of 1974 were repealed and applications were invited to be filed on or before July 25, 1989 which was later extended to August 4, 1989. In the promulgated new Rules ten seats are reserved for Meghalaya, Mizoram one, Arunachal Pradesh one, Nagaland one and in the balance of 343 seats reservations are specified for Scheduled Castes 7%, Scheduled Tribe (Plains) 10%, Scheduled Tribes (Hills) 5%, sons and daughters dependent of Ex-servicemen and serving brother, sister defence personnel from Assam -- 3 seats, sons and daughters dependent brother or sister and grandson or grand-daughter of freedom fighters of the State -- 2 seats, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters of the martyers of Assam Movement -- 2 seats, children of tea garden and ex-tea garden communit...
J. Thomas and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. the Ahmed Tea Co. (P) Ltd. and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Sep-06-1989
S. Haque, J. 1. These 3 Second Appeals have arisen out of the common judgment and decree dt. 29-6-1978 passed by the Assistant District Judge, Jorhat in 3 Title Appeals Nos. 28/1976, 29/1976 and 7/1977 dismissing the appeals and affirming the judgments and decrees passed by the Munsiff, Sibsagar in Title Suits Nos. 28, 29 and 30 of 1974 dismissing the suits. 2. The respondent as plaintiff instituted 3 Money Suits Nos. 45, 46 and 50 of 1969 in the Court of Munsiff, Sibsagar against the Union of India (Railway -- North East Frointer Railway and Eastern Railways) for recovery of compensation on account of loss sustained due to short delivery/damage of the 3 consignments. The Appellant M/s. J Thomas and Co. (P) Ltd. was made a pro forma defendant in all the three Money Suits. The allegation in all the three Money Suits was that the loss was due to gross negligence and misconduct of the servants, agents and employees of the Railway administration concerned and the relief was claimed speci...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›