Guwahati Court January 1988 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Ann Sarkar Vs. Anil Sarkar
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-27-1988
Saikia, C.J. 1. The decree nisi dt. 11-11-87 passed by the District Judge, Dibrugarh under Section 10, Divorce Act, 1869, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', has come up for confirmation in this reference under Section 17 of the Act. 2. The petitioner sued for dissolution of her marriage with the respondent on ground of adultery coupled with cruelty. Examining herself as witness 1, she deposed that she was married to the respondent Anil Sarkar on 6-12-79 at Dibrugarh Christ Church as both of them were Christians. Ext. 1 was their marriage certificate. After marriage they lived conjugal life at Moran but had no issue. Since about 3 months after the marriage the respondent showed indifference towards her, at the same time having affairs with other women and when her protests proved to be useless she went to her mother's house. When her husband used to be with other womenand when she objected her husband threw things at her and behaved very rudely in presence of her daughter by her pre...
Wenmanard Marak Vs. Smt. Poiby Momin
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-27-1988
Saikia, C.J. 1. The decree nisi passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, West Garo Hills, Tura under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 has come up for confirmation under Section 17 of that Act in this reference. 2. The petitioner sued for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent Smt. Poiby Momin on the ground of adultery coupled with desertion. Examining himself, he deposed that the parties were married according to the Christian rites on 15th April, 1954 whereafter they lived as husband and wife. After about 6 months of marriage the respondent deserted him and subsequentlyshe lived with one Honith Sangma as his mis tress and thereby committed adultery with him and the petitioner and the respondent have remained completely separate since then. He further deposed that there was no collusion or connivance between the parties in the matter of filing the petition for divorce; and that the respondent had no objection to the dissolution of their marriage which might be ...
Lal Changmunga Vs. Lianpari
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-07-1988
Saikia, C.J. 1. This is a reference under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 for confirmation of decree nisi dated 16-7-87 passed by the District Judge, Cachar at Silchar under Section 10 of the Act. The petitioner sued for dissolution of the marriage between him and the respondent. Both of them are Mizos by birth and Christians by religion. 2. Examining himself, the petitioner deposed that he married respondent Lianpari on 12th April, 1979 at Silchar according to Christian rites at Silchar Christian Mission. In that wedlock a son was born to them in September, 1980. However, thereafter 'non-adjustment and misunderstanding' developed between them. He was required to go to Shillong for training and during his absence the respondent ''developed intimacy' with one of his friends and a child was born in February, 1981, and that she was living separately and so he wanted divorce. He also stated that the respondent sent affidavit alleging divorce. It appears from the records that th...
Sri. Jogendra Nama and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-06-1988
Saikia. C.J. 1. The three writ petitioners, who are village artisan, blacksmith and craftsman serially, pray for an appropriate writ cancelling the 'Loan Mela' now in operation in the State of Tripura, restraining the respondents from acting upon the loan application forms distributed by the Congress (I) party, and prohibiting the respondents from proceeding further with the Loan Mela' and from distributing further loan application forms by the Congress (I) party and/or any other appropriate orders or directions. They have impleaded as respondents, the Union of India, the Reserve Bank of India, the Indian National Congress (Congress-I), hereinafter referred to as 'Congress (I)', and 11 nationalised commercial banks, which are wholly owned by the Central Government and the Tripura Gramin Bank. 2. The Reserve Bank of India, shortly the RBI, it is stated, earlier formulated three schemes for advancing loans to the weaker sections of the community for upliftment of their economic standard...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›