Guwahati Court April 1987 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ala UddIn Vs. Sishir Kumar Dutta
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Apr-23-1987
Manisana, J. 1. This revision petition arises from the judgment and decree passed by the learned Assistant District Judge Karimganj in Money Appeal No. 40 of 1979 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned Munsiff Karimganj in Money Suit No. 43 of 1978 decreeing the claim of the plaintiff for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,132.81 with costs; hence this petition. 2. The plaintiff-opposite party brought the suit on the footing that on 26-5-75, thedefendant-petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs. 1,800/- by executing a document (Ex.-l) promising to repay the amount on demand but in spite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to re-pay the same. Out of Rs. 2,132.81 claimed by the plaintiff, Rs. 1,800/- was principal amount and Rs. 332.81 was the interest at the rate of 6.25% per annum from 26-5-75 to 11-5-78. The suit was instituted-on 12-5-78. 3. Mr. M. A. Laskar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that the learned Munsiff compared the d...
Amal Saha Vs. Smt. Basana Saha
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Apr-08-1987
S.N. Phukan, J. 1. This is the second time that the petitioner has approached this Court forinvoking the revisional jurisdiction in respect of a proceeding under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, for short, the Act, pendingbefore the learned District Judge, Kamrup, at Gauhati. The dispute relates to guardianship and custody of two minor sons. 2. The opposite party, the mother of the two minor sons filed a petition before the learned District Judge, Kamrup at Gauhati under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 praying for declaration that she is the guardian of her two minor children and also for her appointment as such. She also claimed custody of the children. A preliminary point regarding jurisdiction was raised before the learned District Judge and the learned District Judge by an order dated 22-2-1986 passed in the said proceeding, which was registered as Misc. Case No. G.C. 252 of 1985 held that he had jurisdiction to try the proceeding. Against the said order, this Court was appro...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›