Guwahati Court December 1987 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dainik Sambad and anr. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-15-1987
Saikia, C.J. 1. This petition is taken up for hearing at the Notice of Motion stage as agreed by the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner 1, Dainik Sambad, is a daily newspaper published in Bengali from Agartala, Tripura and petitioner 2 is its owner and Editor. The petitioners allege violation of rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), and 300A of the Constitution of India making mainly five grievances in this petition, namely, (i) that while constituting the Press Advisory Committee with a view to guide the Government of Tripura in matters of itsadvertisement policy and qther matters concerning the press, it discriminated against and interfered with freedom of press of Dainik Sambad by excluding its Editor from the Committee while including those of Weekly Desher Katha, Tapari, Tripura Reporters Guild, and Gandaut; (ii) that the Government has discriminated against the petitioners while fixing the rates structure for Government advertisement in its advertisemen...
Pradip Kumar Savasoria Vs. Srimati Katarina Marak and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-01-1987
S. Haque, J.1. The learned Member, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Shillong directed the appellant by order dated 26-8-1985, in Misc. Case No. 32 of 1985 (M.A.C. Case No. 85/1985), to pay the interim relief of Rs. 15,000.00 under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicle Act. Hence this appeal by the appellant, owner of the Truck No. ASO 3511 which caused the accident resulting death of Shrimati Ajona Marak.2. The ground for appeal is that the vehicle was insured with the respondent No. 3, the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company Ltd. at the relevant time of accident and so, the respondent No. 3 was liable to pay the interim relief under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicle Act.3. Learned Counsel Dr. M.K. Sarma for the appellant submits that there was a valid and subsisting insurance policy of Truck No. ASG 3511 at the time of accident with the Respondent No. 3 and so the insurer was liable to pay the interim compensation under Section 92-A read with Section 110-B of the Motor Vehicle Act ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›