Guwahati Court September 1984 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Duni Rava Vs. State of Assam and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Sep-21-1984
K. Lahiri, J.1. By this habeas corpus application the petitioner questions the validity of his detention under the National Security Act, 1980, for short 'the Act'.2. The relevant facts are that on 8-3-84 when the petitioner was about to be released on bail pursuant to an order granting him bail in a criminal case, he was served with the order of detention dt. Aug. 10, 1983, passed by the State Government Under Section 3(2) of 'the Act'. The order is extracted below:Government of Assam Political (A) Department No. PLA. 910/83/5 Dt. Dispur, the 10th Aug. 1983.ORDERS BY THE GOVERNOR OF ASSAM.Whereas Government of Assam are satisfied with respect of the person known as Shri Juni Rava @ Duni Rava S/o. Late Dhani Rava, village Jamuguri P.S. Kalaigaon that with a view to preventing him from acting in a manner prejudicial to the security of the State and maintenance of public order it is necessary to detain him under the National Security Act, 1980 and to make the following order.Now, theref...
Sudhangshu Mohan Dutta Vs. Smt. Bela Rani Paul
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Sep-19-1984
K. Lahiri, J. 1. This is an application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, forshort, 'the Code', directed against the Order dated 21-12-81 passed by the District Judge, Dibrugarh, in Title Appeal No. 1 of 1981, dismissing the appeal of the petitioner-defendant for appellant's default. 2. In the Title Appeal preferred by the petitioner, Shri L. Hazarika, a just engaged lawyer filed an application on 21-12-81, the date on which the appeal was posted for hearing, praying that he required 15 days time to prepare and argue the case. It was stated in the petition that, Shri Biman Barua, Advocate who had filed the appeal, left the charge of the case expressing his inability to argue the case on 21-12-81 on some personal ground. Shri L. Hazarika, learned counsel categorically stated that he was engaged only on 21-12-81 and he could not prepare the appeal after going through the papers. The prayer was turned down and the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution, when learned ...
Sudhangshu Mohan Dutta Vs. District Judge, Dibrugarh and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Sep-11-1984
Lahiri, J. 1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution directed against an order passed by the District Judge, Dibrugarh declaring the petitioner as a tout, in exercise of power under S. 36 of the Legal Practitioners Act, 1879. The petitioner has also questioned the legality and validity of the proceedings connected therewith. 2. The petitioner states that he practiced as a pleader's clerk under several renowned lawyers of Dibrugarh. In 1975 as well he worked under Sri Biman Barua, Advocate as his clerk and the Registered No. of his Card was 39. The petitioner states categorically that it was the prevalent practice to submit the card of the Pleaders clerk to the Secretary of Dibrugarh Bar Association accompanied by renewal fee of Rs. 6/-. The renewal was the matter of course. The competent authority after such renewal used to return the card to the Secretary, Bar Association who kept it for some time before handing over the sameto the clerk. The petitioner has co...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›