Guwahati Court January 1978 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Supply Co. India Vs. Rafiulla Tea and Industries P. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-06-1978
Lahiri, J. 1. This is an application under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act'), for winding up of M/s. Rafiulla Tea & Industries Private Ltd. (hereinafter termed as ' the company ').2. According to the petitioner, the company was incorporated on September 20, 1972, as a private limited company. The nominal capital of the company is Rs. 75 lakhs divided into 75,000 equity shares of Rs. 100 each. The amount of capital paid up or treated as paid up is Rs. 10,52,000 divided into 10,520 equity shares of Rs. 100 each. The objects of the company, inter alia, are to establish, develop, manage, maintain, cultivate or acquire by purchase, lease or own for the purpose of the company or any other purpose, lands, forest areas, citronella plantations, coffee estates and to manufacture, market wood products of all kinds, and so forth. ' The company ' is the sole proprietor of the firm styled as Messrs. Ply Boards India. On or about 16th ...
Arun Chandra Das Mazumdar Vs. Wajid All and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-04-1978
K. Lahiri, J.1. The petitioner questions the validity of an order passed by the Magistrate refusing to put the petitioner in possession of a disputed land, which was the subject matter of a dispute In a proceeding under Section 145, Cr. P.C. on the grounds that (1) the Court had 'no seisin over the case' as such, it had no jurisdiction to make any order amending, adding or altering the final order which had been passed; and (2) this Court in Criminal Reference No. 25 of 1974 disposed of on 5-6-77 directed the parties to seek redress in Civil Court,2. Mr. N. M. Dam, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is a reversible one, as the Court has failed to exercise its jurisdiction vested in it by law, vide Section 145(6), Cr. P.C.3.-4. The relevant facts necessary for the disposal of the points raised by the counsel for the petitioner may be summarised as follows:The petitioner was the initiator of a proceeding under Section 145, Cr. P.C. (old). A...
Suresh Narayan Roy Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-04-1978
K. Lahiri, J.1. An ugly, disgraceful, reprehensible and incongruous incident quavered the academic tranquillity of the Government Middle English School at Hari village in Arunachal Pradesh on 24-11-1975. A school is a sacred institution where education is imparted to build up moral, social and physical character of the students. School teachers are the maestroes, educators and preceptors who dispense, train, instruct and prime the young minds at their formative stage. They deserve our highest esteem and respect as they are the builders of our national character.2. The prelude could have been avoided but I could not help myself in giving vent to my impulse in view of the shocking-cum-tragic episode.3. The summary of the incident in a condensed form may be set out as follows:P. W. 5 Jatindra Mohan Das was the Headmaster of the Government Middle English School at Hari village in Arunachal Pradesh. In that capacity he had issued an order to all the teachers informing them about the ensui...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›