Skip to content

Guwahati Court July 1977 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 08 1977

JaIn and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jul-08-1977

Baharul Islam, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Gauhati Bench, Gauhati (hereinafter called 'the Tribunal'), has referred the following question to us for opinion ; 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the assessee-firm was not constituted under a valid instrument of partnership and so the assessee-firm was not entitled to registration under Section 185 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67?'2. The material facts of the case may be briefly stated thus; 3. The assessee-firm, M/s. Jain & Co., Fancy Bazar, Gauhati, was constituted on February, 1964, on which date a partnership deed (annexure C) was executed. The deed of partnership showed that the firm consisted of the following five partners: (1) Shri Ratan Kumar Bawari, (2) Shri Sukumar Chandra Jain, (3) Shri Manikchand Agarwalla, (4) Shri Jaiprakash Sharma, (5) Smt. Pushpa Devi Goyal. They all signed the deed ...


Jul 04 1977

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shyam Sundar Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jul-04-1977

Rangarajan, J. 1. The short, but interesting, question that arises for decision in this income-tax reference is whether income-tax due from the assessee which could not be recovered summarily under Section 231 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act '), can be recovered by way of penalty. The reference was made ia the following terms : ' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in cancelling the penalties imposed by the Income-tax Officer under Section 221(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relating to the assessment years 1960-61, 1961-62, 1962-63, 1963-64, 1964-65 and 1965-66, against the assessee, M/s, Shyam Sundar Tea Co. Private Ltd. ?' 2. Only a few facts, which are necessary for disposing of this reference, may be noticed : It is seen from annexure ' A ' that the Income-tax Officer, Collection, Dibrugarh Circle, Dibrugarh; passed an order under Section 221 of the Act as follows : ' M/s. Shyam Sundar Tea Co. (P.) Ltd....


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial