Guwahati Court August 1972 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Kumar Phukan Vs. Mt. Pratima Buragohain
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-28-1972
Baharul Islam, J.1. This application under Section 439, Criminal Procedure Code filed by the second party (husband) is directed against the order dated 15.5.1968 passed by the Magistrate granting maintenance to the first party (wife) and her minor child under Section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2. The facts of the case, in brief, are as follows: The first party made an application claiming maintenance of Rs. 100/- for herself and Rs. 50/- for her minor daughter from the second party. As the notice had not been returned, a fresh notice was issued. As the second notice was also not returned after service, the Magistrate ordered issue of notice by registered post through the Superintendent of Police, Nowgong under whom the second party was serving as Sub Inspector of Police. On 11.4.1968 the Magistrate found that the notice issued by registered post had been duly served and the postal acknowledgment receipt had been received, but as the second party did not appear, he fixed the...
Lairenlakpam Rajbapu Singh and anr. Vs. Wakambam Mani Singh
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-09-1972
B.N. Sarma, J.1. This is a revision petitions under Sections 435/439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, directed against the order of Shri T. Hangshing. Magistrate First Class, I. E., dated 28-10-1971, passed in N. F. I. R. Case No. 7 of 1971 under Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, declaring possession-over the disputed land in favour of the first party.2. The proceeding was drawn up by the learned Magistrate in respect of 1.75 acres of land comprised in Dag No. 153 ot patta No. 67/1 I. E. situated at village Chal-lou within Lamlai Police Station. Both the parties claimed actual physical possession over' the land. The opposite party herein, wha was the first party in the proceeding, filed his written statement, five affidavits including his own. and four documents. The petitioner, who was the second party also filed his written statement, six affidavits including his own, and three documents. On a consideration of the written statements and ther affidavits, the learned Magistrate ...
Buduka Kalita and anr. Vs. the State of Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-04-1972
Baharul Islam, J.1. This application is on behalf of the two petitioners. Buduka Kalita and Ambeswar Kalita. and is directed against the order of conviction and sentence passed in G. R. Case No. 787 of 1965 by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Judicial) Sibsagar. who convicted appellant Buduka under Sections 448/324 of the Penal Code and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for two months and to pay a fine of Rs. 30/- in default to rigorous imprisonment for 10 days more and convicted appellant Ambeswar under Sections 448/323 of the Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month and to pay a fine of Rs. 20/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 days more.2. The prosecution case is that on 12-9-65 at about 3-15 P. M. the two petitioners along with Boji Kalita and Konmai Kalita. entered into the dwelling house of Mamtajuddin Ahmed (P. W. 1). and assaulted his children 'and their private tutor. P. W. 3. P. W. 1 lodged an ejahar at the Amuguri Polic...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›