Guwahati Court August 1969 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rabindra Kumar Bhattacharjee Vs. Smt. Prativa Bhattacharjee
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-29-1969
R.S. Bindra, J.C.1. Shorn of verbiage, the facts relevant to the present revision petition filed by the convict Shri Rabindra Bhattacharjee are that he was married to the complainant Prativa Bhattacharjee, M. A., B.T., in July 1954 at Hoogly, that they could not pull on smoothly as husband and wife despite the fact that they were blessed with a son, Rantu by name, on 23-8-1955 which was soon after the marriage, and that, as alleged by the complainant, her husband entered into second marriage with Anjali Bhattacharjee, a daughter of Gopal Chakraborty of Agartala. On 6-11-1961, Prativa filed a complaint in the Court of Sub-divisional Magistrate at Agartala. Rabindra, the husband of the complainant, was charged in course of time by that Magistrate under Section 494 I. P. C. while Anjali and her father Gopal Chakraborty were both charged under Section 494 read with Section 109 I. P. C. By its judgment dated 20th of May, 1963, the trial Court acquitted Anjali and her father but convicted R...
Thokchom Nimai Singh and anr. Vs. Thangba Kom and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-05-1969
R.S. Bindra, J.C.1. In this reference under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, hereinafter called the Code, the learned Additional Sessions Judge recommends that the order dated 16-6-1966 by which the sub-divisional Magistrate, Bishenpur, dropped the proceedings under Section 145 of the Code and lifted the attachment in favour of the first party with the direction that the opposite party should not interfere with the possession of the first party over the land in dispute should be quashed.2. The facts of the case may first be briefly summarised. On 22-11-1965 the Officer-in-charge of the Police Station, Bishenpur, reported to the sub-divisional Magistrate that there was serious probability of 'clash and blood-shed' between the two parties respecting their right to harvest the crop standing on some patta land in the village. The Magistrate after studying the report and examining the Officer-in-charge of the Police Station directed that proceedings under Section 145 be drawn up...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›