Skip to content

Guwahati Court March 1968 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 06 1968

Silchar Municipal Board on the Complaint of Dr. Nirmal Krishna Vs. Muk ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-06-1968

C. Sanjeeva Row Nayudu, C.J.1. This is an appeal against an acquittal of the respondent Mukul Chandra Deb Roy of Messrs. Chunilal Hulaschand of Silchar on a charge under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'),2. The offence alleged against the respondent is that he Sold sealed condensed milk, which did not conform to the standard which condensed milk should satisfy. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent was selling sealed tins of condensed milk known as 'Queen of the World'. The sample of these tins was purchased by, the Food Inspector the complainant appellant, who sent the same for analysis to the Public Analyst. The report of the Public Analyst showed that on analysis the condensed milk contained milk fat 0.53 per cent and total milk solids 38.01 per cent. As the milk fat contained is recognised to be of the standard of 9 per cent, public analyst opined that the sample sent to him was not full cream condensed milk as declar...


Mar 05 1968

Trailokya Mohan Nath Vs. State and anr.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-05-1968

C. Sanjeeva Row Nayudu, C.J.1. This revision petition is directed against a conviction of the petitioner Trailokya Mohan Nath on a charge under Section 494, Indian Penal Code and a sentence of three months' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100, in default S.I. for one and a half months, he having performed a second marriage with Sefali Debi when his wife Subarna Bala Nath is living. Sefali Debi was also an accused in the case, but she has been acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge.2. The case of the prosecution was that the petitioner having already a wife living by name Subarna Bala Nath, married a second time one Sefali Debi and thus committed the offence of bigamy punishable under the Indian Penal Code read with the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.3. The only point which has been seriously pressed before us by Mr. Chaudhuri, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, is that unless it in established that the second marriage has been duly and properly solemnised in ...


Mar 04 1968

Pramode Chandra and ors. Vs. State

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-04-1968

C. Jagannadhacharyulu, J.1. This is a petition filed under Section 498 Cr. P.C. against the order of the Sessions Judge of Tripura in Criminal Motion No. 37 of 1968, dated 21-2-1968, refusing to grant bail to the three petitioners concerned under Sections 395 and 397 I.P.C. in G. R. Case No. 100 of 1967, Kamalpur, Police Station Case No. 1 (12) 67.2. The case of the prosecution is that at about 2 or 3 A. M. on 2-12-1967 one Kamar Uddin of Methirma village came outside his hut to answer call of nature, that after going back into his hut, he warmed himself by kindling the fire, that after a while he went to bed keeping the fire kindling and the door unbolted, that then about 10 persons including the petitioners entered into the hut and committed dacoity by stealing Rs. 1750/- in cash and other articles and after causing severe injuries to Kamar Uddin, that Kamar Uddin, his wife and his niece recognized the petitioners and that at about 8 A. M. the F.I.R. was lodged with the Police Stati...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial