Guwahati Court December 1967 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Phani Bhushan Gupta Vs. the State
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-25-1967
C. Jagannadhacharyulu, J.C.1. This is an appeal filed by the accused Phani Bhushan Gupta in Special Court Case No. 4 of 1963 against his conviction under Section 161, I.P.C. and also under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947 and concurrent sentences to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year under each count.2. The appellant, who was working as Court Sub-Inspector No. 2 in the Sadar Criminal Courts in Agartala, was charged, firstly, under Section 161, I.P.C., that he accepted a sum of Rs. 12 on or about 9.5.1963 in the Criminal Court buildings in Agartala from one Abdul Rajak of Takarjala, Police station Bhishalgarh, as illegal gratification for doing his official act to-grant certificate of fitness to the said Abdul Rajak for standing as surety for one Boxa Ali, an accused in G.R. Case No. 226 of 1963 in the Court of the S.D.M., Sadar. Secondly, he was charged that the offence also fell under Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947 and that...
Md. Rahamad Mia and ors. Vs. Government of Manipur
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-08-1967
C. Jagannadhacharyulu, J.C.1. This is a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Manipur under Section 438, Cr.P.C. to set aside the conviction of the accused-petitioners under Section 447 I.P.C. and sentences that they should pay Rs. 50 each and that, in default of payment, they should suffer S.I. for one month each, imposed by the M.I.C., I.W. in G.R. Case No. 35 of 1962 on his file.2. The petitioners 8 in number, belonging to Paobitek village in Mayang-Imphal were charged for the offences under Sections 447, 323 and 148 I.P.C. on the ground that they committed criminal trespass into the paddy land possessed by P.W. 5 (Abdul Salam) covered by Patta No. 85/14-1. W.T. rioting armed with deadly weapons, and that they caused hurt to P. W. 3 (Abdul Manaf), P.W. 5 (Abdul Salam) and P.W. 7 (Abdul Hei) at about 6-30 a.m. on 13.5.1962.3. The prosecution examined 8 witnesses. The Magistrate came to the conclusion that the paddy field was in the possession of P.W. 5 (Abdul Salam) at th...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›