Guwahati Court December 1966 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jamkhokhai Kuki Vs. the State of Manipur
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-16-1966
C. Jagannadhacharyulu, J.C.1. Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1966 was filed by the accused Jamkhokhai Kuki of Tolhang village in Sessions Case No. 2 of 1965 on the file of the Sessions Judge at Imphal, against his conviction under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentence that he should be hanged by his neck until he is dead.2. Criminal Reference No. 8 of 1966 is a reference made by the Sessions Judge under Section 374 Cr.P.C. for confirmation of the sentence of death passed by him on the appellant.3. The appellant Jamkhokhai Kuki of Tolhang was charged with the offence of murder under Section 302, I.P.C. on the allegation that he murdered one Pakang alias Yamkhosem of the same village of Tol-hang at about 6-00 p.m. on 16.8.1964 by stabbing him with a knife at the outskirts of the village of Tolhang. The appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge.4. The case of the prosecution according to the charge sheet and as brought out in the evidence is as follows:(a) Tolhang is a hill village which is situate...
Laiphrakpam Leiren Singh and ors. Vs. Nongthombom Leiren Singh and ors ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-09-1966
C. Jagannadhacharyulu, J.C.1. This ease arises out of a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Manipur, under Section 488, Cr. P.C. to set aside the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate-Imphal East, Manipur, dated 9-3-65 passed by him in N. F. I. R. case No. 309 of 1964 under Section 145 (6) Cr. P.C. declaring that -the-respondents were in possession of the disputed land at the relevant time, that they are entitled to the possession thereof until they are evicted therefrom in due course of law and forbidding all disturbance of such possessions until such eviction.2. The brief facts of the case which led to the reference in question are as follows : : There are about 6 1/2 paris of land in Matai village, covered by Pattas No. 1/282, 2/106 and 3/136 Imphal East. The case of the petitioners herein is that the petitioners Nos. 1, 6 and 7 purchased the said land in 1957 from the heirs of late Sir Churachand Singh, the Maharajah of Manipur under a registered sale deed, that the...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›