Guwahati Court June 1965 Judgments
Workmen of AppIn Tea Estate Vs. Industrial Tribunal and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-24-1965
G. Mehrotra, C.J.1. By a notification dated 8 October 1960. the State of Assam referred the folio wing two questions for adjudication to the presiding officer, industrial tribunal, Assam, under Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act:1. (a) Whether the management of Appin Tea Estate's refusal to pay to their workmen prosperity bonus for 1953-54 as per Delhi agreement and also Fagua and Puja bonus for 1959 is Justified?(b) If not, how and when bonuses should be paid ?2. (a) Whether the clalm of workmen of the aforesaid management for compensation tor failure of the management to supply food grains to them during 1959 at Rs. 20 par mi and as par Government Notification No. GLB. 129/55/40, dated 31 May 1955, is justified ?(b) If so, what amount of compensation are the workmen entitled ?The presiding officer of the industrial tribunal gave its award dated 26 November 1963, which was published In the Assam Gazette on 11 December 1983. The tribunal held on issue (1)(a) that the tea ...
Tag this Judgment!Government of Manipur Vs. Hornapla Tangkhulni
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-18-1965
Rajvi Roop Singh, J.C.1. This is an appeal by the Government of Manipur against the judgment and order of S.D.O. Magistrate Second Class, Ukhrul, dated 25.9.1964 by which he acquitted the respondent Hornapla Tangkhulni of the offences under Sections 447 and 379 I.P.C.2. The facts leading up to this appeal are few and simple. On 9.11.1961 Ngariphung Nagini and Rasim Shaiza lodged the complaint in the Court of S.D.M. Ukhrul against the respondent Hornapla Tangkhulni and others under Sections 447 and 379 I.P.C. with the contention that the accused trespassed in their paddy field called Shiyang and harvested paddy crops standing thereon. The S.D.M. without taking cognisance of the complaint forwarded it to the Officer in charge Police Station, Ukhrul, for investigation. The Police treated it as a written F.I.R. and registered the case under F.I.R. 73 (11)/61 Ukhrul Police Station under Sections 447 and 379 I.P.C. and after investigation a charge-sheet was submitted to the Magistrate only ...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Laisram Nipamacha Singh Vs. Smt. Khaidem Ningol Sakhi Devi and or ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-18-1965
Rajvi Roop Singh, J.C.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 30-1-64 passed by S.D.M., 1.W. by which he ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 20/- to opposite party No. 1 and Rs. 10/- per month to his minor daughter as a maintenance allowance.2. The material facts are not in dispute and they may be briefly stated as follows:On 14-12-62, the opposite party No. 1 on behalf of herself and 3 minor children opposite party Nos. 2 to 4 presented an application to the S.D.M., I.W. for proceeding under Section 488 Cr.P.C. against her husband the petitioner with the contention that she was the legally married wife of the petitioner and after their marriage they lived as husband and wife-for some years in the house of the petitioner and during that period she gave birth to these 3 children. While their marriage was in subsistence the petitioner contracted a second marriage and thereafter he started illtreating her without any reason. As she could not tolerate the cruelty and ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›