Guwahati Court November 1965 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Malsawn Lushai and anr. Vs. Manipur Administration
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Nov-29-1965
Rajvi Roop Singh, J.C.1. The appeal in this case is directed against the judgment of learned Sessions Judge of Manipur dated 24.1.1964 convicting the appellants Malsawn Lushai and Chhawanhuia Lushai of offences Under Section 302/32, 349 I.P.C. and Section 14 of Foreigners Act respectively. They have been sentenced to imprisonment for life Under Section 302/34 I.P.C. 7 years R.I. Under Section 394 and 2 years R.I. Under Section 14 of Foreigners Act. The learned Sessions Judge has directed the sentence to run concurrently. The State of Manipur has filed a Revision petition for enhancement of life imprisonment to sentence of death. This revision petition was entered as Criminal Revision Case No. 5 of 1964 and a notice was issued to the appellants to show cause why their sentence should not be enhanced so as to make it in accordance with the Law. The appeal and revision will in these Circumstances be disposed of together by this judgment.2. The facts of this case fall within a narrow ambi...
Janaki Nath Chakraborty Vs. Prakash Chandra Dutta and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Nov-05-1965
Rajvi Roop Singh, J.C.1. This is a reference made under Section 438 Cr, P.C. by the learned Sessions Judge, Tripura, in Criminal Application No. 14 of 1964, of his file for orders of this Court.2. The circumstances that led to the reference briefly narrated are as follows:On 22-12-62, Janaki Nath Chakraborty, the petitioner, filed in the Court of Magistrate First Class, Belonia a petition of complaint under Sections 379 and 147 I.P.C. against the opposite parties and 113 other persons with the allegation that they in a body illegally reaped away ripe paddy from 2 kanis 10 gandas of land lying to the north-eastern portion of 9 kanis of land, appertaining to jote No, 32 of Mouza Paschim Pillak in spite of protest by him. As a result of reaping away his paddy he sustained a loss to the tune of Rs. 400/-. Along with this petition of complaint he filed a list of 12 witnesses mentioning therein that they were the eye-witnesses to the occurrence. After initial examination of the complainant ...
Jogendra Kumar Das and anr. Vs. Aswini Kumar Choudhury
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Nov-04-1965
Rajvi Roop Singh, J.C.1. This is a Criminal Reference made by the learned Sessions Judge, Tripura, with a recommendation for setting aside the order dated 4-5-64 passed by the Magistrate First Class, Belonia, in Criminal Misc. Case No. 12 of 1963.2. The facts giving rise to this reference are that on 22-4-63, the opposite party, Aswini Kumar Choudhury as 1st party filed a petition before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Belonia with the contention that in the current year he had grown Bajal and Aush paddy in 8 kanis of land owned and possessed by him and appertaining to jote No. 21 of Mouja Radhakeshoreganja under Belonia Tahashil that there is a very old cherra lying to the south of this land and the second party members Jogendra Kumar Das and Kali Mohan Das have wrongfully constructed a bundh on the said cherra about 5/6 days back and obstructed the water and that as a result of that the crop standing in the entire 8 kanis of land has been destroyed therefore, immediate steps be taken...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›