Guwahati Court June 1963 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Wahongdam Gulap Singh Vs. Moirangthem NIn Gol Konsam Ongbi Radhadevi a ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-16-1963
T.N.R. Tirumalapad, J.1. This revision petition is filed against the orders of the S. D. M., Bishenpur, Under Section 147, Criminal Procedure Code dated 21-6-1962 and 24-8-1962, directing the petitioner not to interfere with the exercise of the right of user by the 1st respondent over a disputed path and further to remove the posts and shed raised by the petitioner in the disputed path. The Magistrate held in his first order that the said disputed path-way had been in existence for a very long time and that the petitioner had no right to put up posts in order to obstruct the use of the path by the first respondent and further that he put up the shed after the petition Under Section 147 Criminal Procedure Code was filed by the first respondent.In his original order dated 21-6-1962, the Magistrate merely directed the petitioner not to interfere with the use of the path-way by the first respondent, but he did not pass any order directing the removal of the obstructions, namely, the posts...
Mayengbam Yaima Singh Vs. Manipur Administration and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-06-1963
T.N.R. Tirumalpad, J.C.1. The second respondent herein filed a petition before the S. D. M. I. E. and The stating that the land under patta No. 66/730 belonged to him, that he had been in cultivating possession of it for 15 to 16 years, that in 1962 he raised paddy thereon, that on 19-11- 1952, the petitioner with his son forcibly entered in the field and began to reap the growing paddy, that when the second respondent protested, the petitioner threatened his life and that the said conduct of the petitioner will cause a serious breach of the peace which may lead to bloodshed. The Magistrate sent it for a Police report on the same date and the Police reported on 26-11-1962, supporting the second respondent and stating that the land in question belonged to him and that proceedings under Section107 Cr.P.C. should be drawn up against the petitioner.On this Police report, the Magistrate drew up pro-setting under Section 107 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner on 27-11-1962 and issued summons to...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›