Guwahati Court June 1962 Judgments

Aswini Kumar Das Vs. Raman Chandra Mohanta

Court: Guwahati

T.N.R. Tirumalpad, J.C.1. The respondent in this case filed a complaint before Shri S.N. Roy Cboudhury, the S.D.M. of Dharmanagar against the petitioner Aswini Kumar Das and another Nalini Kumar Das accusing them of criminal trespass and assault and against Nalini Kumar Das further for outraging the,. modesty of complainant's sister-in-law. The S.D.M. took cognizance of the case and transferred the case to a second class Magistrate Shri S.R. Chakravorty. He dealt with the case for sometime and examined the complainant and 2 P. Ws. and while the matter was pending before him for further trial, Shri A. Bhattacherjee who had become S.D.M. by then withdrew the case to his own file and after the examination of further P. Ws. he framed charges under Sections 447 and 352 against the petitioner and Nalini Kumar Das and a further charge under Section 354 Indian Penal Code against Nalini Kumar Das.Then Shri A. Bhattacharjee ceased to be the S.D.M. but continued to be the magistrate, first class...

Dhirendra Chandra Saha and ors. Vs. Tripura Administration

Court: Guwahati

T.N.R. Tirumalpad, J.C.1. The petitioners were convicted by the first class magistrate, Sadar under Section 353, I.P.C. and each of them sentenced to undergo R.I. for 6 months. In the appeal to the Sessions Judge, their conviction was confirmed but their sentence was reduced to 2 months' R.I. each. Now they have come up in revision.2. On 16-7-59 at about 8 P.M., P.W. 1 N.R. Datta, an Inspector of Land Customs, Preventive; Unit along with P.W. 2, a Sub-Inspector of Land Customs and a Peon, Ajit Das were patrolling in the Arundhutinagar area in the course of their preventive work. On seeing a rickshaw drawn by rickshaw puller, P.W. 3 with the petitioners 1 and 2 inside it along with a gunny bag put under a bundle of fuel and another basket on top of the fuel coming from the direction of the Pakistan, border, they stopped the said rickshaw and searched it and found the gunny bag and the basket to contain betelnuts. P.W. 1 thereupon asked the rickshaw puller to proceed to the Customs Offi...

Surendra Chandra Debnath and ors. Vs. Raghunath Sil

Court: Guwahati

T.N.R. Tirumalpad, J.C.1. The petitioners were convicted by the first class Magistrate, Sadar under Section 379, I. P.C. and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 25/- each. They filed a revision before the Sessions Judge. But the Sessions Judge did not consider it a fit case to make a reference to this Court. Hence, the petitioners have come up directly in revision to this Court.2. The case against the petitioners was that on 26-9-1958 they along with certain others entered the laud of the respondent 3 kanis in extent in which he had raised jute crops, harvested the Jute crops thereon and also removed certain harvested crops left on the land by the respondent. The respondent filed the complaint in Court only on 30-9-1958. The defence of the first petitioner was that the said land belonged to him and was in his possession for 4 or 5 years before the occurrence and that he Had raised the jute crops thereon and he admitted having cut and removed the said jute crops, but it was even before the ...

Satyanarayan Tea Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Assam.

Court: Guwahati

MEHROTRA C.J. - The following question of law has been referred to us by the income-tax Appellate Tribunal, "B" Bench, Calcutta, under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, Hereinafter called the Act, for our opinion :"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, deduction of Rs. 23,770 and Rs. 28,927 on account of bonus payable for the year 1955 and 1956, but actually paid after the end of the accounting year 1956, were admissible deduction from the business income of the company under section 10 for the assessment year 1957-58 ?"The assessee, Messrs. Satyanarayan Tea Co. (P.) Ltd., Dibrugarh, is a private limited company doing tea business and the assessments year in question is 1957-58, the accounting year being the year ending on the 31st December, 1956. The account were kept according to the calendar year. From the year 1953, the company had been agitating for bonus to be payable in its account of bonus from the year 1954 onwards In the ac...

Lenson Koireng S/O Late Munril Vs. Manipur Administration

Court: Guwahati

T.N.R. Tirumalpad, J.C.1. The appellant Lenson Koir-eng, has filed this appeal against his conviction under Section 302 I. P. C, and against the sentence of life imprisonment passed against him by the Sessions Judge, in Sessions Trial No. 25 of 1961 on 27-2-1962.2. The case against the appellant is briefly as follows:There is a village School in the village, Makokching Sadu. The villagers including P. Ws. 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7, the deceased Tinsongir, the appellant and his. brother Lenhung (P. W. 2) attended a meeting of the villagers on 20-6-1961 and decided, that the villagers should work on 27-8-1961 for plastering the walls of the School with mud and straw. Accordingly, the work started early morning on 27-8-1961 and all the persons mentioned above except the appellant were doing the work. As the appellant was late, the villagers who were working decided to fine the appellant. When the appellant arrived at about 9-00 a. m. or so, P. W. 7 told him that he has been fined Rs. 3/-. The app...

Lenson Koireng S/O Late Munril Vs. Manipur Administration

Court: Guwahati

Reported in: 1963CriLJ592

T.N.R. Tirumalpad, J.C.1. The appellant Lenson Koir-eng, has filed this appeal against his conviction under Section 302 I. P. C, and against the sentence of life imprisonment passed against him by the Sessions Judge, in Sessions Trial No. 25 of 1961 on 27-2-1962.2. The case against the appellant is briefly as follows:There is a village School in the village, Makokching Sadu. The villagers including P. Ws. 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7, the deceased Tinsongir, the appellant and his. brother Lenhung (P. W. 2) attended a meeting of the villagers on 20-6-1961 and decided, that the villagers should work on 27-8-1961 for plastering the walls of the School with mud and straw. Accordingly, the work started early morning on 27-8-1961 and all the persons mentioned above except the appellant were doing the work. As the appellant was late, the villagers who were working decided to fine the appellant. When the appellant arrived at about 9-00 a. m. or so, P. W. 7 told him that he has been fined Rs. 3/-. The appe...