Guwahati Court December 1962 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Munsar Ali and ors. Vs. Union Territory
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-15-1962
T.N.R. Tirumalpad, J.C.1. The petitioners Munsar Ali Torab Khan, Rasul Khan and Manjur Ali were convicted and sentenced by the munsiff-magistrate, Udaipur, Munsar Ali under Section 323 to a sentence of 6 months Rule I. and a fine of Rs. 200/-, Torab Khan and Rasul Khan under Section 326 I.P.C. to 18 months Rule I. each and Manjur Ali under Section 326 I.P.C. to Rule I. for 6 months. In the appeal filed by them the learned Sessions Judge upheld the conviction of Munsar Ali under Section 323 I.P.C. but reduced his sentence to 1 month's Rule I. and a fine of Rs 100/-. He also confirmed the conviction of Torab Khan and Rasul Khan but reduced their sentences to 1 year's R.I. each. In the case of Manjur Ali he altered the conviction to one under Section 323 I.P.C. from Section 326 I.P.C. and he reduced his sentence to one month's R.I. and a fine of Rs. 100/.- The petitioners have now come up in revision.2. The occurrence out) of which this case arose took place in the morning of 29-3-195. A...
Moba Maring and ors. Vs. Parhat Angba Maring and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-07-1962
T.N.R. Tirumalpad, J.C.1. These are two petitions against the convictions and sentences of the respective petitioners under Section 428 I.P.C. The Magistrate convicted the respective petitioners and sentenced them to a fine of Rs. 60/-jointly in each of the cases. But in the appeals tiled by the respective petitioners, this irregularity was corrected and the convictions were confirmed, and separate tines were imposed on each of the petitioners.2. The facts relating to the two revision petitions are more or less similar. The respective petitioners in each of the cases were alleged to have killed a pig each of the respective respondents at about 1-00 p.m. on 12-9-1960. The respective respondents filed separate complaints before the Magistrate on 13-9-1960. The Magistrate did not examine the respective complainants on oath in either of the complaints but sent the complaints for report by the Police. In both the cases, the Police reported that the fact of the killing of the pigs by the re...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›