Guwahati Court November 1958 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Biswanath Singh Vs. Additional Chief Engineer (R. and B.) Wing P.W.D. ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Nov-28-1958
G. Mehrotra, J.1. This Rule was issued on an application under Article 226 of the Constitution. By this application the petitioner prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus and certiorari directing the opposite party No. 1 and 2 to settle the right of collection-of tolls of the Silonipam ferry with the petitioner and further prayed mat the order of settlement passed by respondent No. 3--The State of Assam--be quashed.The facts which are necessary for disposal of this petition are that the petitioner is a resident of village Chaibari Charali under Sootea Police Station in the district of Darrang. By a notification issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Darrang, tenders were invited for collection of tolls of the Silonipam P.W.D. ferry on the Jiabhoroli river in. the district of Darrang for a period of one yean with effect from 1-4-58 upto 31st March, 1959.'Tenders were however, received but ultimately public auction was held on the 15th of April, 1958 by the Deputy Commissioner, Darran...
Benoy Kumar Chakrabarty Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Nov-25-1958
G. Mehrotra, J.1. This Rule has been issued on an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ of mandamus or certiorari or any other appropriate writ against the opposite parties to show cause why the order passed by them should not be quashed. The petitioner is a resident of Lakhipur under Goalpara Subdivision in the district of Goalpara and had made an application for granting him a stage carriage permit for Lakhipur-Goalpara route. Along with the petitioner one Khairuddin had also applied for the grant of a permit on the same route. The petitioner and Khairuddin were considered suitable for the grant of the permit.The Regional Transport Authority of Gauhati in its meeting held on 25th and 26th October 1956, decided & granted a stage carriage permit to the petitioner for the Lakhipur-Goalpara route for a period of three years with effect from 1-12-56. The Goalpara Bus Association opposed the increase of number of stage carriage permits on Lakhipur-Goalpara route in ...
Bindu Nath Chaudhury Vs. the State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Nov-24-1958
H. Deka, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ for quashing the Order of the Government appointing respondent No. 4, Jatindra Nath Chaudhury a Mauzadar of the Batahgila mauza. The facts leading to this petition are as follows : 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Kamrup district invited applications for filling up the vacancy of a Mauzadar within his jurisdiction in the Batahgila mauza of the Kamrup district, and there were only two candidates,--the petitioner and respondent 4. The Deputy Commissioner recommended appointment of respondent 4 Jatindra Nath Chaudhury as the Mauzadar and he was actually appointed mauzadar by the Govt. subject to furnishing cash security of Rs. 5,000/- and the balance of Rs. 22,000/- in property security within seven days from the date of the receipt of the appointment letter, and this was sometime in March, 1957. The respondent No. 4 took charge of the mauza accordingly and started collection of revenue but he not being in ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›