Skip to content

Guwahati Court February 1956 Judgments

Browse smarter

Turn browsing into brief-ready notes

Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 17 1956

Chunilall Rajendra Kumar Vs. State of Manipur and anr.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Feb-17-1956

Brij Narain, J.C.1. This is an application on behalf of Chunilall Rajendra Kumar, a joint Hindu family partnership firm carrying on business at Maxwell Bazar, P.S. Imphal, for obtaining a writ of mandamus or a writ of a like nature or an order directing the respondent 1 to refrain from interfering with the business of the petitioner and for quashing any order that might have been passed against the petitioner disallowing him from exporting, 252 maunds of chira purchased at Imphal in February/March, 1955 for the purpose of earning sufficient profits during the course of carrying on its business in various commodities including foodstuffs of rice, paddy, chira etc.2. The petitioner has been carrying on wholesale business in various commodities including foodstuffs of rice, paddy, chira etc., and according to the petitioner the right of free trade in rice, paddy, chira and other similar commodities and also for export from Manipur to places outside Manipur has been guaranteed by the Cent...


Feb 13 1956

Narendralal Mukherjee Vs. the State

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Feb-13-1956

Ram Labhaya, J.1. This petition of revision is directed against an order of Shri A. Mukherjee, special Magistrate dated 23-8-1955, by which he held that on the charge-sheet submitted to him, he had taken cognizance of the case and that there was no ground for quashing the charge-sheet.2. The petition for the quashing of the charge-sheet was made by the accused under the following circumstances:3. The petitioner is an officer of class II of North Eastern Railway. At the relevant date he was Inspector of Works. On receipt of confidential report Shri G. C. Deb, Sub-Inspector of Police of Special Police Establishment informed the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Special Police Establishment that the petitioner had committed offences under Sections 408 and 477A, Penal Code in respect of 3706 bags of cement belonging to the Railways. The case was registered on 19-5-1954.Shri G. C. Deb himself investigated the case under orders of the Deputy Superintendent of Police. On 27-1-1955 he submitted ...


Feb 09 1956

Keramat Ali Vs. Abdul Matlib Ali and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Feb-09-1956

Reported in: 1956CriLJ858

1. This reference under Section 438, Criminal P. 0. from the Sessions Judge, Lower Assam Districts arises out of a proceeding under Section 145, Criminal P.C. Facts are fully stated in the order of reference.2. On 24-10-1952 petitioner Keramat Ali initiated the proceeding under Section 145 by a petition. His case was that he and 38 other persons were allotted an area of 585 bighas of land by revenue authorities and that the Mandal had delivered possession of the said land to them. They had learnt that the second party were preparing to remove forcibly paddy grown by them on an area measuring 555 bighas. The petitioner apprehended a breach of the peace.3. The learned Magistrate asked for a re-port from the police and acting on the report received, he passed the preliminary order under Section 145, Criminal P.C. and also directed the police to attach the disputed land in view of the apprehended breach of the peace. The land attached was 585 bighas in 39 plots appertaining to Odalani Kism...


Feb 09 1956

Keramat Ali Vs. Abdul Matlib Ali and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Feb-09-1956

Reported in: 1956CriLJ858

ORDERRam Labhaya, J.1. This reference under Section 438, Criminal P. 0. from the Sessions Judge, Lower Assam Districts arises out of a proceeding under Section 145, Criminal P.C. Facts are fully stated in the order of reference.2. On 24-10-1952 petitioner Keramat Ali initiated the proceeding under Section 145 by a petition. His case was that he and 38 other persons were allotted an area of 585 bighas of land by revenue authorities and that the Mandal had delivered possession of the said land to them. They had learnt that the second party were preparing to remove forcibly paddy grown by them on an area measuring 555 bighas. The petitioner apprehended a breach of the peace.3. The learned Magistrate asked for a re-port from the police and acting on the report received, he passed the preliminary order under Section 145, Criminal P.C. and also directed the police to attach the disputed land in view of the apprehended breach of the peace. The land attached was 585 bighas in 39 plots appertai...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial