Guwahati Court June 1951 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nirmal Prasad Barua Vs. the State
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-25-1951
Thadani, C.J.1. This is a revision petition filed by one Nirmal Prasad Barua under the provisions of Section 439, Cr.P.C. in a case in which he was convicted Under Section 409, I.P.C. and sentenced to R.I. for 12 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 600 or in default to undergo further R.I. for 6 months by Mvi. A. Rahman, Magistrate of the First Class, Gauhati. On appeal, his conviction, and sentence were confirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, L.A.D. Apparently the learned Additional Sessions Judge was informed that the petitioner was undergoing a sentence of imprisonment passed in another case, and he, therefore, directed that the sentence of imprisonment passed in this case was to run concurrently with any sentence of imprisonment that the applicant may be already undergoing in another case.2. The case for the prosecution was that the petitioner, as the Agent of the Gauhati Bank Limited at Gauhati, obtained a sum of Rs. 13,000 from the Gauhati branch of the Calcutta National...
Koijam Tombi Singh Vs. Chongtham Pisak Singh
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-15-1951
Lakshmi Narain, J.C.1. K. Tombi Singh has filed this revision petition against the order of the Superintendent of Police passed in his capacity as Magistrate, first class, regarding the suspected property, i.e., some 4 or 6 lorry-loads of. salvage material in the shape of zali and iron posts etc., seized from the possession of his carriers and thereafter delivering its possession to the respondent Ch. Pisak Singh who is the other claimant. The above material was handed over to the respondent without any condition whatsoever.2. During the proceedings of this petition some adjournments were taken by the parties for compromise but to no effect.3. The facts disclosed from the record before the court are as follows: two drivers of Tombi Singh who were deputed to bring 2 lorry loads of salvage material from the dump belonging to him reached Imphal on or about 7.3.49 and complained to Tombi Singh that their lorries containing iron scraps, motor vehicle parts, brass scraps etc., were seized b...
Chunilal Bhoopal Vs. Amarendra Chandra Dutta and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-08-1951
Ram Labhaya, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,200. The suit was decreed in the trial Court. The learned Additional Subordinate Judge reversed the decree of the Court below and dismissed the suit. The plaintiff has come to this Court on second appeal.2. In the trial Court, the plaintiff's case was that the husband of defendant 4 who was the father of defendants 1 to 3 borrowed Rs. 1,200 in cash from him on 27-8-1943 and executed a hand-note for it. He agreed to pay interest at the rate of 1 per cent, per mensem on the amount borrowed. On 12 9-1943, plaintiff demanded the repayment of the loan and he got a cheque dated 12-9-1943 for the amount from his borrower, who being dead is now represented by the four defendants. The cheque was duly presented in Bank on 12-9-1943 but it was dishonoured. The plaintiff alleged that he informed Jogendra Dutta, deceased, about its dishonour, but he did not pay the money but was just putting him off. He died in...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›