Guwahati Court July 1950 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tambak Singh and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-24-1950
Ram Labhaya, J.1. This is an appeal from the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, U A. D., dated 26-3-1950, by which two appellants Tambak Singh and Gopi Singh (nos. 1 & 2) were convicted under Section 304, Part II and sentenced each to rigorous imprisonment for 4 years. Appellant 3, Chourajit Singh, was convicted under Section 325, Penal Code, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2 years. Tambak Singh and Gopi Singh were found responsible for causing the death of Montaz Ali. Chourajit Singh was found to have caused grievous hurt voluatarily to Monjit Ali.2. The occurrence, which resulted in the death of Montaz Ali and injuries to three others, namely, Monjir Ali, Ayub Ali and Mayur Ali, took place at about 8/9 a. m within the limits of mouza Nityanandapur on 2 5-1949.3. A written report was presented by Amir Ali. a brother of Montaz Ali, deceased, about this occurrence to the Officer-in-charge of Haila-kandi P. S. at 4 P. M. on that date. The report was written by Pr...
Oyali Mia and anr. Vs. Naib Ali
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-12-1950
Sen Gupta, J.C.1. This Rule is directed against an order of the Sessions Judge of Tripura dismissing an appeal against the conviction of the petitioners Oyali Mia and Sona Mia, father and son, under Section 383, I.P.C. by the Saddar Magistrate of Agartala, sentencing each of them to rigorous imprisonment for six months.2. The case for the prosecution in brief was that Jahora, a girl of seven years was given in marriage to the Complainant's son and was living in the Complainant's house when she was taken in Naiyar (a causal visit) to her mother's house & from there to the house of an uncle of hers. While returning from there with the complainant, she was forcibly taken away by the Petitioners for giving her in marriage with Sona Mia.3. The defence was that Jahora was actually married to Sona Mia, that the complainant was not the lawful guardian of Jahora and that the story of kidnapping was false.4. Both the learned Magistrate and the learned Sessions Judge found as a matter of fact th...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›