Gujarat Court June 2015 Judgments
German Tool Room Employees Union Vs. General Manager Indo German Tool ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-29-2015
Oral Judgment: M.R. Shah, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 08.12.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No.17333/2014 by which the learned Single Judge has dismissed the said Special Civil Application preferred by the appellant herein “ original petitioner and has confirmed the judgment and award passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government, Industrial cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal ?) in Reference (CGITA) No.162/2012 by which the learned Tribunal dismissed the said reference, the appellant herein “ original petitioner has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal. 2. That in the year 1993 applications were invited by giving an advertisement for the post of technical manpower. The respective appellants “ workmen applied and cleared the interview and practical test, but they were not given the appointments as per the advertisement (the afo...
Tag this Judgment!Chief Manager Vs. Anil Popatlal Ghelani and Another
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-24-2015
Cav Judgment: 1. Rule. Ms. Pancholi, Ld. Advocate waives service of rule for the respondents. 2. The petitioner herein is a bank which has challenged the award dated 28/9/2011 rendered by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court of Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal'] in Reference No. CGITA of 1232 of 2004. By such impugned award, the Tribunal has directed the bank to reinstate the present respondent no. 1 with continuity in service and to pay 50% back wages and to actively consider his case for absorption as Sepoy within 3 months from the date of receipt of such award with a condition that failing to comply with such direction, 50% back wages shall carry interest @ 9% p.a. 3. The petitioner has also challenged the demand notice dated 31/7/2012 issued by the Assistant Labour Commissioner [C], Adipur, Kutch and also prayed to stay implementation and execution of such award and demand notice. 4. By order dated 3/10/2012 this Court [Coram : Abhilasha Kum...
Tag this Judgment!Nayak Chuniben Chandubhai and Others Vs. Chief Election Commissioner a ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-19-2015
Oral Judgment: 1. By the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged order dated 05.05.2015 at Annexure 'C' passed by the respondent No. 2the Returning Officer whereby the nomination papers of the petitioners to contest election as members of the Gram Panchayat came to be rejected. The petitioners have also prayed for direction to allow them to contest election of the Gram Panchayat which was scheduled on 17.05.2015. 2. It appears that since rival candidates raised objections against the nomination of the petitioners that the petitioners did not have Toilets and the certificate given by the Talati of the village was false, the Returning Officer got the physical verification made at the residential places of the petitioners through the Taluka Development Officer. After the site inspection when it was reported that the petitioners have Toilets but with incomplete closet (cesspool) commonly known as Khalkuwa, the Returning Officer...
Tag this Judgment!Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - TDS Circle Vs. Vodafone Essar Guja ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-12-2015
M.R. Shah, J. 1. Rule. Learned advocate Mr. Sandeep Singhi waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent No.1. 1.1 By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the impugned orders passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "learned Tribunal") in Stay Application Nos.85 and 86/AHD/2011 in ITA Nos.386 and 387/AHD/2011 for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10, by which the learned Tribunal has extended stay granted earlier beyond the period of 360 days. 2. Feeling aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the earlier orders for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10, the assessee had preferred appeals before the learned Tribunal. That as per the assessment order for AY 2008-09, the tax liability is for an amount of Rs.7,21,19,094/- (including interest u/s 201(1A) of Rs.1,20,19,849/-) and for AY 2009-10, tax liability is Rs.9,04,43,478/- (including interest u/s 201(1A) of Rs.1,75,05,189/-). That in the respective appeals befor...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›