Gujarat Court October 2011 Judgments
Natvarbhai Bhayjibhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-20-2011
1. By way of this appeal, the appellant – original accused challenges the judgment and order dated 19.02.1997 passed by the learned Special Judge, Bharuch in Sessions Case No.1 of 1992 by which the learned Judge has convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under section 7 read with Section 13(1)(g) and section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and he was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4(four) years and to pay fine of Rs.4000/and in default of payment of fine, further rigorous imprisonment for 1(one) year for the offence under section 7 and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4(four) years and to pay fine of Rs.4000/and in default of payment of fine, further rigorous imprisonment for 1(one) year for the offence under section 13(1)(g) and section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act . Trial Court also passed order that the sentence to run concurrently. 2. The facts in brief are as under : [2.1.] That complainant Shri Ilyas Ibrahim Pat...
Tag this Judgment!Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Dawoodbhai I Ghanchi
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-20-2011
ORAL JUDGMENT KS JHAVERI, J. 1. By way of this Letters Patent Appeal, the appellant- petitioner has challenged the Judgement and order dated 07.03.2002 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 3975 of 2001 whereby the petition filed by the appellant-petitioner was partly allowed. 2. The short facts of the case are that the respondent -workman was working with the appellant-Corporation as Vehicle Examiner. He was in the habit of remaining absent unauthorizedly for which in past suitable punishments were imposed on him and he was given chance to improve. Inspite of that, the respondent remained absent unauthorizedly for the period from 09.10.1992 to 10.12.1992 causing inconvenience to the appellant- Corporation. After holding departmental inquiry and as the misconduct alleged against the respondent was proved, he was dismissed by order dated 17.12.1992. The departmental appeal was filed by the respondent which was not accepted as the same was time barred and it...
Tag this Judgment!Hasmatiben Thakordas Parekh and Others Vs. Nirupamaben K. Jiv Rajani a ...
Court: Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Ahmedabad
Decided on: Oct-17-2011
1. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhavnagar on 14.5.2008 in Consumer Case No. 101 of 2007 which came to be partly allowed, the appellants have preferred this appeal on the grounds stated in the appeal memo. Main contention of the appellants is that the complaint was clearly time barred and no delay condonation application was given by the respondents with complaint. The order of learned Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum on merits is illegal. The appellants are original opponents and respondents are original complaints and they are referred to their original nomenclature for the sake of convenience. 2. The short facts of the case are that the opponents had floated a scheme of 16 flats in 1997 known as Gautam Krupa. The complainants had joined the scheme and the opponents had executed sale deed also in their favour. The complainants however cleverly have not stated the date of sale document and kept the same as blank as disclosed fro...
Tag this Judgment!iffco-tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Yogeshbhai D. Navdivala and ...
Court: Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Ahmedabad
Decided on: Oct-17-2011
Mrs. Jyoti P. Jani, Member: 1. The original opponent being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surat (Addl.) in Complaint No. 512 of 2008 dated 7.3.2009 whereby the complaint came to be allowed has filed the appeal for the sake of convenience, parties to this appeal are hereinafter referred to by their original nomenclature. 2. Short facts of the case are the complainant and his family had mediclaim policy from the opponent Insurance Company. During the subsistence of the policy, the complainants son was admitted on 7.3.2008 in the hospital and was diagnosed as acute viral hepatitis for which Rs. 23,143 were incurred as medical expenses. He was discharged from the hospital on 14.3.2008. The claim was lodged before the opponent Insurance Company which was repudiated on 28.4.2008 on the ground that the concerned hospital is unregistered and does not have operation theatre facility. Hospital must be registered or 15 be...
Tag this Judgment!Niranjanbhai T. Parekh and Others Vs. Ajaybhai Harshadbhai Shah
Court: Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Ahmedabad
Decided on: Oct-17-2011
S.A. Makhija, Member: 1. This complaint is filed under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act or C.P. A. for the sake of brevity). 2. The short facts of the complainants case are that the complainants had their own plot No. 70-A at Bhavnagar, details of which are given in para-2 of the complaint. The complainants decided to float a scheme of flats on their plots and as such they had given contract of those flats for construction and building them to one Kamal Trivedi who had left the work half way. The opponent thereafter was hired to complete the remaining work of the scheme. It is the say of the complainants that there were disputes between the parties in regard to payments to the opponent therefore he had filed a Special Civil Suit No. 70 of 2004 in the Court of Civil Judge (S.D.) which came to be withdrawn unconditionally by the opponent as there was compromise between the parties. As per agreement dated 4.2.2003 the opponent was req...
Tag this Judgment!Rajiv a Joshi Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
ORAL JUDGMENT 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, Rajiv A. Joshi, who appears as party-in-person for the prayer inter alia that the order passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, City Sessions Court No.12, Bhadra, Ahmedabad in Criminal Revision Application No.281 of 2011 dated 06.08.2011 and also the order passed by the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No.9 in Criminal Case No.5869/2010 (Old Case No.983/2003) dated 09.05.2011 may be quashed and set aside on the grounds stated in this petition. It is also prayed that appropriate relief may also be granted. 2. The facts of the case briefly stated are that the petitioner, party-in-person, who was original complainant, had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and the family friend, Ms.Smita Patel may be permitted to remain present and make submissions on his behalf in the said trial. The said application was not entertained and rejected by the Court of the Metropolitan Mag...
Tag this Judgment!Principal Chief Engineer Vs. Manibhai and Brothers (Sleeper) and Anoth ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
1. Rule. Mr. Paresh M.Dave, learned advocate, waives service of notice of Rule, for respondent No.1. Mr.Niraj Soni, learned Assistant Government Pleader, waives service of notice of Rule, for respondent No.2. 2. The challenge in this petition, preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, is to the impugned Award (referred to as an 'Order' by the petitioner) dated 21-08-2010, passed by the State Level Industry Facilitation Council, constituted under Section 21 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act” for short). 3. The brief factual background of the case, as garnered from the Memorandum of the petition and material on record, is as follows: 3.1 The petitioner is the Principal Chief Engineer, Western Railway. Respondent No.1 is a Registered Small-scale Manufacturer, who has established a Factory for manufacture of goods, such as Pre-stressed Mono-block Concrete Sleepers, that are being supplied to the Western Railway...
Tag this Judgment!AmiruddIn @ Mina Hameedbhai Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-07-2011
Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; } } Print CR.MA/13224/20112/2ORDERINTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCRIMINALMISC.APPLICATION No. 13224 of 2011InCRIMINALAPPEAL No. 119 of 2010=========================================================AMIRUDDIN@ MINA HAMEEDBHAI SHAIKH - Applicant(s)VersusSTATEOF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)=========================================================Appearance:MRASHISH M DAGLI forApplicant(s) : 1,MR LR PUJARI, APP for Respondent(s) :1,=========================================================CORAM:HONOURABLEMR....
Tag this Judgment!Dhaval Ganeshbhai Sirke (Marathi) Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-07-2011
Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; } } Print CR.MA/12825/20113/3ORDERINTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCRIMINALMISC.APPLICATION No. 12825 of 2011=========================================DHAVALGANESHBHAI SIRKE (MARATHI) - Applicant(s)VersusSTATEOF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)=========================================Appearance :MRCHETAN B RAVAL forApplicant(s) : 1,MS CM SHAH, LD. ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR forRespondent(s) : 1,=========================================CORAM: HONOURABLEMR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYEDDate: 07/10/2011ORALORDERByway of prese...
Tag this Judgment!Nalanda Education Trust Vs. National Council for Teacher Education (We ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-07-2011
Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; } } Print SCA/11899/201120/20 INTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADSPECIALCIVIL APPLICATION No. 11899 of 2011ForApproval and Signature: HONOURABLETHE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.L.DAVE HONOURABLEMR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA=====================================================1WhetherReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?2Tobe referred to the Reporter or not ?3Whethertheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?4Whetherthis case involves a substantial question of law as ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »