Gujarat Court January 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Gujarat. Vs. Thavarbhai Vinchhiyabhai RathvA.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. As per the submission made by the registry, the State of Gujarat has preferred above numbered Criminal Appeal against the order of acquittal against the Respondent accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.2. While Admitting the Appeal, this Court has issued bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.5000/- against the Respondent accused and the registry has therefore issued bailable warrant against the Respondent accused, but the accused could not furnish the bail bond, and therefore, he was taken into judicial custody.3. It is further submitted by the registry that the record and proceedings along with paper book has been received and therefore the matter is ready for final hearing and this is an acquittal appeal and as per serial, the final hearing of this acquittal appeal will take long time and in this acquittal appeal, accused is in jail as he has not furnished bail bond. 4. Therefore the registry has placed this matter for passing appropriate order for fixing the early date o...
Jalpesh Kishorchandra KalolA. Vs. Saurashtra University and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner, a student of M.Sc. (Botany) against the order dated 31.8.2010 passed by the respondent Saurashtra University whereby the petitioner is debarred from appearing in the present examination and also one future examination.2. It will be evident from the impugned order dated 31.8.2010 that a large number of students were debarred from the present examination and future examination. In some other case, one such student moved challenging the similar order and a Division Bench of this Court noticed that the chits recovered from the students on the date of the examination were not related to the subject concerned. In most of the cases, chits were lying beneath the bench and were recovered in presence of the students from the bench or beneath the bench. 3. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, the Division Bench by common judgment dated 11.10.2010 passed in Special Civil Application No. 11288 of 2010 and analogous case, set asid...
Kasambhai Ibrahimbhai Masru. Vs. State of Gujarat.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. Rule. Mr. learned APP, waives service of notice of Rule for respondent State.2. This successive bail application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with first information report registered at CR No.I 41/2010 with Jadar Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that charge sheet is filed. He further submits that the applicant has roots in the society, will not flee from justice and will cooperate with the investigation as and when called for. It is further submitted that considering the allegations levelled against the applicant and role attributed to him, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.4. Heard learned APP for the respondent State.5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the case and taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegat...
State of Gujarat for and on Behalf of P P Jadav. Vs.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. The appellant-State of Gujarat has preferred the present appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of acquittal dated 26^th February 2010 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sankheda, in Criminal Case No.501 of 1995 for the offences punishable under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, whereby the learned Magistrate has acquitted the respondent-accused of the charges levelled against him.2. The short facts of the prosecution case is that the appellant along with panch witness visited the shop of respondent-accused whereby the respondent was doing his business. It is the case of the complainant that the complainant purchased Rolax Glucose Biscuit after paying consideration. It is also the case of the prosecution that after following due procedure of sealing, the sample was sent for analysis to the Pubilc Analyst, Vadodara. On examination, the Public Analyst found that the said sample was adulterated...
Manoharbhai @ Manubhai Ratilalpanchal. Vs. Darshanaben Prakashbhai Rat ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. This appeal has been filed against the order passed below Notice of Motion (Exhibit-7) filed in Civil Suit No.1038/2004 by the learned Chamber Judge, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad dated 19.09.2008, whereby, the Notice of Motion was partly allowed by directing original defendants, the appellant and respondent nos.4 to 10 herein not to transfer any of the immovable properties mentioned in the plaint till the final disposal of the suit except their undivided share of properties; the appellant and respondent no.4 herein were also directed to pay Rs.15,000/- per month to respondent no.1 by Account Payee cheque to meet the routine expenses from the income of "Prakashbhai Ratilal Panchal Family Trust"; the appellant was also directed to hand over possession of the residential house being 701, Shantanu Flats, Navrangpura to respondent no.1 for the purpose of residence of respondent nos.1 to 3. Respondent nos.1 to 3 were also directed to revise valuation of court fees and to pay the deficit co...
Chehrabhai Jesungbhai Gol Patel. Vs. State of Gujarat.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. RULE.2. Mr. R.C.Kodekar, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State of Gujarat.3. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.4. The applicant convict prisoner, who, vide judgment and order dated 30.12.2009 rendered in Sessions Case No.159 of 2007 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.3, Palanpur, has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life, has filed this application praying for suspension of sentence and to release him on regular bail during the pendency and final hearing of the above numbered Criminal Appeal.5. We have considered the submissions advanced by Mr. Pravin Gondaliya, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr.R.C.Kodekar, learned APP for the Respondent State of Gujarat. We have also perused the impugned judgment and oder convicting the Applicant accused of the...
Mugla Nathabhai Angari and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. RULE.2. MR. L.B.Dabhi, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State of Gujarat.3. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.4. By filing instant Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 ("the Act" for short), the Applicant has prayed to condone the delay of 51 days caused in filing the above numbered Criminal Appeal.5. Having considered the submissions advanced by Ms. Kruti M. Shah, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Mr. L.B.Dabhi, learned APP for the Respondent State of Gujarat, and a perusal of the averments made in the Application which have remained uncontroverted, and also considering the celebrated principles governing the discretionary exercise of power conferred under Section 5 of the Act so also the reported decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court construing Section 5 of the Act liberally, we are of the considered opinion that delay caused in filing the Appeal has be...
State of Gujarat. Vs. Mohmmed Hanif @ Annubhai Abdulbhai Sheikh and an ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. By way of present application, the applicant-State of Gujarat has inter alia prayed to cancel the order of granting regular bail to the respondents-accused vide order dated 15^th April 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.18, Ahmedabad City in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.1266 of 2010.2. Heard Mr.H.L. Jani, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr.Faiyazi Shaikh, learned counsel for the respondents-accused.3. Mr.Faiyazi Shaikh produced on record order dated 01^st November 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.16, Ahmedabad whereby the condition No.6 i.e. "applicants are directed to mark their presence before the concerned Police Station till the trial is over" imposed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.18, Ahmedabad is deleted and exempted the respondent No.1-Mohammed Hanif @ Annubhai Abdulbhai Sheikh from marking his presence on every 5^th day of the calendar month.4. In view of order dated 01^st Novembe...
State of Gujarat. Vs. Pravinbhai Chhaganbhai Patel and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. Challenge in this Appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 4.10.1990 rendered in Sessions Case No. 62 of 1989 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sabarkantha at Himatnagar acquitting the Respondents accused of the offences punishable under Section 302, etc. of the Indian Penal Code.2. This Appeal is listed before us pursuant to the submission made by the registry inter alia stating that Respondent No.2 Chhaganbhai Jaychandbhai Patel, Respondent No.4 Lavjibhai Jaychandbhai Patel and Respondent No.6 Amichandbhai Kodarbhai Patel have expired.3. The death certificate along with the police report certifying that they have died is also annexed at Flag 'A'.4. In view of this, since Respondent No.2 Chhaganbhai Jaychandbhai Patel, Respondent No.4 Lavjibhai Jaychandbhai Patel and Respondent No.6 Amichandbhai Kodarbhai Patel have expired, the Appeal filed against them is required to be abated and accordingly stands a...
Mogal Ibrahimkhan Jamalkhan. Vs. State of Gujarat.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. Rule. Mr. learned APP, waives service of notice of Rule for respondent State.2. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with first information report registered at CR No.I 182/2010 with Unjha Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 395, 397 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that charge sheet is filed. He further submits that the applicant has roots in the society, will not flee from justice and will cooperate with the investigation as and when called for. It is further submitted that considering the nature of allegations and role attributed to the applicant and other attending circumstances, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.4. Heard learned APP for the respondent State.5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the case and taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, role attributed to the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »