Skip to content


Gujarat Court January 2011 Judgments Home Cases Gujarat 2011 Page 1 of about 367 results (0.003 seconds)

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Vinoddas Sibudas. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

1. Rule. Mr. RC Kodekar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent State of Gujarat.2. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.3. The applicant convict prisoner, who, by judgment and order dated 20.12.2007 rendered in Sessions Case No.80 of 2007 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch, has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced imprisonment of life, has filed this application through jail authority, praying to enlarge him on temporary bail for a period of 60 days, to get the treatment of the doctor of his own choice as he is suffering from the aliment of piles and old pulmonary koch's.4. Having heard Mr. RC Kodekar, learned APP for the respondent State of Gujarat and upon perusal of the averments made in the application so also the jail remark sheet as well as the certificate dated 20.1.2011, we have noticed that the appl...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Raysing Pahadsing Gohil. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

1. RULE.2. Mr. R.C.Kodekar, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State of Gujarat.3. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.4. The applicant convict prisoner, who, vide judgment and order dated 29.01.2010 rendered in Sessions Case No. 1 of 2008 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch, has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302, etc. of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life, has filed this application through jail authority, praying to enlarge him on temporary bail for a period of 30 days to enable him to find out suitable match for his daughter who has reached to a marriageable age.5. We have considered the submissions advanced by Mr.R.C.Kodekar, learned APP for the Respondent State of Gujarat and perused the averments made in the application so also the jail remark sheet forwarded by the jail authority along with the application.6. Upon p...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Babu Laljibhai. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

1. RULE.2. Mr. L.B.Dabhi, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State of Gujarat.3. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.4. The applicant convict prisoner, who, vide judgment and order dated 11.03.2008 rendered in Sessions Case No. 68 of 2005 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Jamnagar at Khambalia, has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life, has filed this application through jail authority, praying to enlarge him on temporary bail for a period of 30 days to enable him to find out a suitable match for his daughter who has reached to a marriageable age.5. We have considered the submissions advanced by Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned APP for the Respondent State of Gujarat and perused the averments made in the application so also the jail remark sheet forwarded by the jail authority along ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

State of Gujarat. Vs. Nainaben Madansinh Shapa and ors.

Court : Gujarat

1. The applicants have filed this application for clarification in the order dated 21.1.1010 in Civil Application No. 12718 of 2009 by making following prayers.[a] This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow this application;[b] This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to clarify that the payment of salary / wages to the original petitioners, as directed by the Hon'ble Court are to be paid by the respondent trust i.e. Gujarat Kelavani Trust and the State Government is not liable to make payment of wages / salary to the original petitioners.[c] Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this application, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to clarify the order dated 21.01.2010 [Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Bhagwati Prasad and Hon'ble Mr.Justice Bankim N. Mehta] that the payment of salary / wages to the original petitioners, as directed by the Hon'ble Court are to be paid by the respondent trust i.e. Gujarat Kelavani Trust and the State Government is not liable to make payment of wages / salary...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Galjibhai Haribhai Gurjar. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

1. RULE.2. Mr. L.B.Dabhi, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State of Gujarat.3. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.4. The applicant convict prisoner, who, vide judgment and order dated 2.11.2007 rendered in Sessions Case No. 191 of 2007 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.5, Himagnater at Idar, has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life, has filed this application through jail authority, praying to enlarge him on temporary bail for a period of 30 days to enable him to search out his wife and children whose whereabouts are not known and also to render financial assistance to his father as there is nobody to look after him.5. We have considered the submissions advanced by Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned APP for the Respondent State of Gujarat and perused the averments made in the applicat...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Suman Damodar Dhobi. Vs. the State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

1. RULE. Mr.L B. Dabhi, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent State of Gujarat.2. By instant application under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed for suspension of sentence awarded to him and to release him on regular bail during the pendency and final hearing of the above numbered criminal appeal. Alternatively, it is also prayed to expedite the hearing of the criminal appeal.3. We have heard learned advocates for the parties.4. At the time of hearing of this application, Ms.Kruti M. Shah, learned advocate for the applicant does not press this application and seeks leave to withdraw the same.5. Mr.L. B. Dabhi, learned APP for the respondent State of Gujarat has no objection if leave as prayed for is granted. Hence, leave to withdraw the application is granted.6. The application stands rejected as it is withdrawn. Rule is discharged....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Keshabhai Gangabhai. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

1. Rule. Mr. LB Dabhi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent State of Gujarat.2. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.3. The applicant convict prisoner, who, by judgment and order dated 24.5.2006 rendered in Sessions Case No.28 of 2005 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Kachchh - Gandhidham has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment of life, has filed this application through jail authority, praying to enlarge him on regular bail during pendency and final hearing of the main appeal or in the alternative, praying to pass appropriate order for expeditious hearing of the main appeal.4. Having heard Mr. LB Dabhi, learned APP for the respondent State of Gujarat and upon perusal of the averments made in the application so also the jail remark sheet, no case is made out for grant o...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

PARSOTTAMBHAi MADHUBHAi PATEL THRO'KANTABEN PARSOTTAMBHAi. Vs. STATE O ...

Court : Gujarat

1. RULE.2. Mr. R.C. Kodekar, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent State of Gujarat.3. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.4. The applicant- convict prisoner, who vide judgment and order dated 15.2.2008, rendered in Sessions Case No. 195 of 2001, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Amreli, has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life, has filed this Application, through his wife -Kantaben Parshottambhai Patel, praying to enlarge him on temporary bail, for a period of 60 days, to enable him to get it repaired his house, which has become dilapidated.5. We have considered the submission made by Mr. R.C. Kodekar, learned APP for the respondent State of Gujarat. We have also perused the averments made in the application and the supporting document that form part of the application. We ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Vasudev Mulajibhai. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

1. RULE.2. Mr. L.B.Dabhi, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State of Gujarat.3. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.4. The applicant convict prisoner, who, vide judgment and order dated 29.05.2008 rendered in Sessions Case No. 92 of 2007 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Anand, has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life, has filed this application through jail authority, praying to enlarge him on temporary bail for a period of 45 days to enable him to find out a suitable match for his daughter who has reached to a marriageable age.5. We have considered the submissions advanced by Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned APP for the Respondent State of Gujarat and perused the averments made in the application so also the jail remark sheet forwarded by the jail authority along with the application.6. Upon perusal of...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

PARSOTTAMBHAi MADHUBHAi PATEL STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.THRO'KANTABEN P ...

Court : Gujarat

1. RULE.2. Mr. R.C. Kodekar, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent State of Gujarat.3. Having regard to the facts of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.4. The applicant- convict prisoner, who vide judgment and order dated 15.2.2008, rendered in Sessions Case No. 195 of 2001, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Amreli, has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life, has filed this Application, through his wife -Kantaben Parshottambhai Patel, praying to enlarge him on temporary bail, for a period of 60 days, to enable him to get it repaired his house, which has become dilapidated.5. We have considered the submission made by Mr. R.C. Kodekar, learned APP for the respondent State of Gujarat. We have also perused the averments made in the application and the supporting document that form part of the application. We ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //