Gujarat Court September 2009 Judgments
Rachna D. Shah Through Maternal Grand-father and Next Friend Vs. State ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-17-2009
Reported in: (2010)1GLR417
K.S. Radhakrishnan, C.J.1. Petitioner Rachna D. Shah, represented by her maternal grand-father, is a person with disabilities entitled to the protection under the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (for brevity 'the Disabilities Act'). Petitioner was born on 22.11.1992 with 94% hearing impairment. In spite of her disability, she faced life with courage and determination. Physical disabilities did not deter her in exhibiting her talents in arts and music. She passed Prarambhik Exams in vocal and instrumental (Harmonium) with first class from Gandharva Maha Vidhyalay. Petitioner has also various stage performances to her credit. Petitioner has good knowledge of computers and has also achieved skills in skating, art skating, road cycling, stitching, embroidery, handicraft, folk dance, group dance.2. Petitioner, though having 94% hearing impairment, did not gave-up her studies as well. She cleared 10th standard examination...
Tag this Judgment!Manishi Jani S/O Thakorlal Jethalal Jani and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-04-2009
Reported in: AIR2010Guj30; (2010)1GLR437
K.S. Radhakrishnan, C.J.1. Francis Bacon, Lord Chancellor of England and a renowned Jurist quoted thus;2. Read not to contradict and confute; not to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider. Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested: that is, some books are to be read only in parts, others to be read, but not curiously, and some few to be read wholly, and with diligence and attention.3. Government of Gujarat in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.PC) read with Section 153A and 153B of the Indian Penal Code (for short IPC) issued a notification dated 19th August, 2009 ordering to forfeit and prohibit the book named Jinnah-India, Partition, Independence written by Shri Jashwant Singh and also its display, sale and distribution and any kind of its use in the State of Gujarat. Notification states that the Government of Gujarat ...
Tag this Judgment!Dhanraj Mohanbhai Chandel Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-03-2009
Reported in: (2009)3GLR2469
Ravi R. Tripathi, J.1. The present petition is filed challenging order dated 12th May, 2009 (Annexure 'G') and letter dated 20th June, 2009 (Annexure 'H') to this petition.The case of the petitioner is that initially retail kerosene licence No. 89 of 1981 was issued to one Shri Latifbhai Alibhai Shaikh in the year 1981. The petitioner entered into a partnership with said Shri Latifbhai Alibhai Shaikh in the year 1985. This entry of the petitioner as a partner was with the permission of the concerned authority, as contemplated under clause/condition 13 of the licence, which is relevant. It reads as under:13. Any change in the ownership of business as shown in Part II of the licence shall amount to the transfer of licence to the ownership so changed resulting in contravention of Sub-clause (3) of Clause 4 of the order unless such transfer of licence is approved by the licensing authority.2. The learned Advocate for the petitioner made available for perusal original licence. This licence ...
Tag this Judgment!In Re: Incy Cybertech (P.) Ltd. Vs.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-02-2009
Reported in: [2010]97SCL165(Guj)
Jayant Patel, J.1. The present petitions are for seeking sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation of M/s. INCY Cybertech Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner of Company Petition No. 69 of 2009), M/s. XMO Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner of Company Petition No. 70 of 2009), M/s. PBP Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner of Company Petition No. 71 of 2009), M/s. Ageek Stamp Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner of Company Petition No. 72 of 2009) and M/s. Umiya Financial Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner of Company Petition No. 73 of 2009) (hereinafter referred to as 'Transferor-Company/ies') with M/s. Khurana Builders Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner of Company Petition No. 74 of 2009) (hereinafter referred to as 'Transferee-Company').2. The Scheme of Amalgamation is produced at Annexure 'C' of the petition.3. In case of all the transferor-companies, vide order dated 23-3-2009 passed by this Court in Company Application No. 93 of 2009 to Company Application No. 97 of 2009, as the consent letters were produced, the meetings of equi...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›