Gujarat Court April 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramprakash R. Upadhyay Vs. Manager Rang Pharmaceticals Indus.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-02-2008
Reported in: (2008)3GLR2339
H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. PH Pathak for the applicant original workman and Mr.JV Japee, learned Advocate for the opponent original petitioner first party.2. Main matter being SCA No. 24778 of 2006 has been filed by the original petitioner challenging award made by the labour court, Bharuch in Reference (LCB) No. 19 of 1997 dated 31.7.2006 wherein the labour court has granted reinstatement with 40% back wages for interim period. In the said petition,rule has been issued by this Court on 30.11.2006 and ad. interim relief has been granted by this Court but on 12.3.207, ad interim relief in terms of para 8(b) was confirmed subject to compliance of Section 17B of the ID Act, 1947, meaning thereby, reinstatement has been stayed by this Court. Order of dismissal/discharge/termination is dated 18.10.1996 and more than 12 years have passed from the date of dismissal. Respondent workman is suffering from cancer as per the observation made by the labour court in para 2 of award...
Aktharbibi Abdul Razak Gulam Rasul and ors. Vs. United India Insurance ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-02-2008
Reported in: 2009ACJ1823; AIR2008Guj146
ORDERC.K. Buch, J.1. Heard Ms. Amita M. Shah, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Madhu Barot for Ms. Avani S. Mehta, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. The petitioner by invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, has prayed to issue appropriate writ, order or direction to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sabarkantha at Himmatnagar, mainly in the following terms:(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to hold and declare that the succession certificate is not required in the present case and the petitioners are entitled to the disbursement of the amount towards the compensation which came to be deposited by the respondent Insurance Company before the M.A.C. Tribunal, Himmatnagar, District Sabarkantha on 19-9-2001 and accordingly, your Lordships be pleased to pass the appropriate orders for disbursement of the claim amount of deceased Shri Bhurabhai to is heirs and legal representatives who are the petitioners herein.(B)...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›