Gujarat Court March 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhankhla Juth Telibiyan Utpathak Sahakari Mandali Ltd. Vs. District Re ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-03-2008
Reported in: AIR2008Guj131
Jayant Patel, J.1. Rule. Mr. Shukla learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for the State Authority in SCA No. 3919 of 2008 and Ms. Trushal Patel learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for the State Authority in SCA No. 3925 of 2008. With the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for both the sides, the matters are finally heard today.2. The petitioner by this petition has challenged the order passed by the District Registrar and its confirmation thereof by the Addl. Registrar (Appeals) and the State Government whereby the final order of liquidation has been passed.3. Upon hearing learned Counsel appearing for both the sides, it appears that the present case is covered by the decision of this Court in SCA No. 15465 of 2006 decided on 21.02.2008. In the said decision, this Court observed as under:5. It appears that Section 107 of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') which is relevant for the purpose of this petition reads as under: 1...
Sahitya Mudranalaya and 10 ors. Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission a ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-03-2008
Reported in: (2008)216CTR(Guj)174; [2009]312ITR115(Guj)
D.A. Mehta, J.1. This petition has been preferred by as many as 11 petitioners challenging orders dated 28.03.1995 and 11.09.1995 made by the Settlement Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commission').2. The following reliefs have been prayed for:22. The petitioners therefore, pray:A. that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India quashing and setting aside the order of the Special Bench of the Settlement Commission dated 20-3-1995 to the extent it holds that the petitioners are liable for interest Under Section 234B(1) read with Sub-section (4) of the Income-tax Act for asst. years 1989-90 and 1990-91 in cases where no interest was as such leviable Under Section 234B(1) and quashing the consequential directions for levy of such interest given by Additional Bench Bombay of the Settlement Commission by its order dated 11-9-1995.B. that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue an appropriat...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›