Gujarat Court December 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India (Uoi) and 3 ors. Vs. S.P. Gawade Asst. Commissioner
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-02-2008
Reported in: (2009)2GLR1287
R.M. Doshit, J.1. Heard the learned advocates on interim relief. Both the learned advocates agree that the matter be decided finally.2. In the present petition, the petitioners, Union of India and Ors., challenge the judgment and order dated 20th July, 2007 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as 'the tribunal'] in Original Application No. 475 of 2006.3. For the act of misconduct proved against the respondent, an appraiser, employed under the respondent No. 4, the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, the respondent was visited with punishment of reduction in pay by one stage coupled with withholding of one increment without future effect.4. Feeling aggrieved, the respondent preferred appeal before the appellate authority, the President of India. In consonance with the settled procedure the appeal was referred to the Government of India. Pending the said appeal, the respondent filed the Original Application No. 475 of 2006 before the Tri...
Arvindkumar Manilal Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-01-2008
Reported in: (2009)2GLR947
C.K. Buch, J.1. Heard Mr. S.R.Divetia, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant-accused and Ms. D.S. Pandit, learned APP appearing for the opponent-State. None has appeared for the complainant-opponent No. 2.2. By means of filing the present Criminal Revision Application, the applicant [original accused] [hereafter to be referred to as 'the accused'] has assailed the legality and validity of the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate [Court No. 8], City of Ahmedabad in Criminal Case No. 32 of 1989, where under, the accused has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 7 read with Section 16(1)[a] of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955 [here after to be referred to as the 'PFA Act']. Learned trial Judge has imposed fine of Rs. 1,000/- upon the accused and in default of payment of fine, the accused is sentenced to further imprisonment of 15 days. The order of conviction and sentence was challenged by way of an appeal by the a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›