Gujarat Court March 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Core Healthcare Limited Vs. Nirma Limited
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-01-2007
Reported in: [2007]138CompCas204(Guj); [2007]79SCL47(Guj)
R.S. Garg, J.1. This judgement shall dispose of Company Petition Nos. 9 and 10 of 2006. 2. Company Petition No. 10 of 2006 has been filed under Sections 78, 100, 391 and 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act' for short) by the Company named Core Healthcare Limited, a company incorporated under the Act in the matter of a composite Scheme of Arrangement in the nature of compromise with the lenders and reconstruction, reorganisation of capital and demerger between Core Healthcare Limited and Nirma Limited and their respective shareholders. The petitioner-Company has prayed for the following reliefs:(a) The Modified Composite Scheme of Arrangement referred to in para-15 of this petition and being Annex. with this petition hereto, be sanctioned by this Hon'ble Court so as to be binding on all Equity Shareholders, Class 'A' Lenders and Class 'B' Lenders of the Petitioner Company and on the Petitioner Company;(b) That the Petitioner Company do within 30 days from the date of sealing of the...
Shrimant Ranjitsinh P. Gaekwad Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-01-2007
Reported in: (2007)2GLR1814
R.S. Garg, J.1. Petitioner - Rajmata Shantadevi Pratapsinhrao Gaekwad, is before this Court throwing challenge to the orders passed by the Mamlatdar, confirmed by the Deputy Collector and approved by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in Ceiling matter where under after rejecting the objections raised by the petitioner, 10 Acres and 25 Gunthas land was declared surplus.2. Mr. Kavina, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that from entry No. 99 of the register maintained by Talati, it would appear that the orders were passed in NA 44/1 on 6.1.54 in respect to the land of survey No. 429 and if the land is shown to be non-agricultural land, provisions of the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 would not be applicable. Referring to Section 2[6] which defines Sclass of land and Section 2[17] which defines land, it is submitted that the land if is not cultivable, is not used for agricultural operations or is registered as non-agricultural land, then the provisions of Section 3[c] of...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›