Gujarat Court February 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rashmikaben Bahecharbhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and 3 ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-02-2006
Reported in: [2006(110)FLR1018]
Jayant Patel, J.1. The short facts of the case are that the petitioners, who have obtained admission in PTC after 12th Standard and thereafter on the basis of PTC have applied for the post of Vidhya Sahayak. The challenge by the petitioners in the petition is that the marking criteria for allotting 40 marks to the examination of HSC should not be equated with the examination of SSC and it has been submitted that there should be identical classification for counting of the marks on the basis of SSC examination. It is further the case of the petitioners that the petitioners have secured higher marks in SSC and lesser marks in HSC and if other candidates who have obtained admission in PTC after SSC, for the purpose of appointment of Vidhya Sahayak are to be considered on the basis of the marks in SSC, there is no reason why the petitioners should also be given same treatment. It is the contention of the petitioners that if the marking is reconsidered on the basis of SSC, the petitioners' ...
Parmar Dipubhai B. and 10 ors. Vs. Registraqr of Co-operative Societie ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-02-2006
Reported in: (2006)2GLR1615
H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Tushar Mehta, Mr. Paresh Upadhyay and Devang Vyas on behalf of petitioners. Heard learned advocate Mr. Gautam Joshi for GUJCOMASOL, Shri A.J. Yagnik for respondent No. 3 GUJCOMASOL Staff Association and learned GP Shri A.D. Oza with learned AGP Shri Mukesh Patel on behalf of Registrar of Cooperative Societies and Shri D.P. Joshi, Joint Registrar, Respondents No. 1 and 4.2. In this group of petitions, petitioners have challenged order passed by respondent No. 1 dated 28th February, 2003/3rd March, 2003 and retrenchment notices issued by respondent No. 2 dated 22nd March, 2003. According to petitioners, order passed by Registrar, Cooperative Societies is having effect of terminating services of 161 employees including petitioners. Same challenge is made by petitioners in this group of petitions pursuant to notice of retrenchment received by them from respondent No. 2 on the basis of the order of Registrar, Cooperative Societies dated 28th Febr...
Kanubhai P. Shah Vs. Bank of Baroda, thro' Chairman and Managing Direc ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: [2006(111)FLR1147]; (2006)IIILLJ373Guj
B.J. Shethna, J.1. Admit. Mr. Darshan Parikh waives Notice for the respondents.2. At the joint request of learned Counsel for the parties the matter is heard and disposed of by this order.3. The appellant petitioner was working as the Officer of the respondent Bank. He was served with charge-sheet dated 15.4.1985 (Annexure : A) along with the statement of allegations. There were in all 10 charges levelled against him. At the conclusion of the inquiry the Appellant delinquent submitted his detailed reply dated 6.3.1986, running into about 33 typed pages, to the Inquiry Officer (Annexure : C). Shri B.H. Patel, Inquiry Officer immediately on the next day i.e. on 7.3.1986 submitted his Inquiry Report, running into 36 typed pages, and came to the conclusion on the basis of the evidence and the reply of the delinquent that out of 10 allegations, allegation Nos. 2(1), 2(4) and 2(10) were not found to be proved and the allegations No. 2(7), 2(8) and 2(9) were found to be partly proved, whereas...
Gujarat Housing Board Vs. Manibhai Mangalbhai Patel and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: (2006)2GLR1385
R.M. Doshit, J.1. These two appeals preferred under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 arise from the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 1997 passed by the learned Asst. Judge, Nadiad, in Land Acquisition Case No. 140/88. The appellant in First Appeal No. 952/1998 is the Gujarat Housing Board, the acquiring body (hereinafter referred to as 'the Board'). The appellant in First Appeal No. 1848/98 is one Manibhai Mangalbhai, the constituted attorney of the land owners. 2. The subject-matter of these appeals are the lands bearing Survey Nos. 167, 168, 169, 173, 174/1, 175/1 and 175/2 admeasuring 32509 sq.mtrs. situated at Village Chaklasiparty, Taluka Nadiad, District Kheda (hereinafter referred to as 'the acquired lands). The said lands were proposed to be acquired by the Board for a housing scheme. The preliminary notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was published in the Official Gazette of the Governme...
Zahir Maksudbhai Vohra Vs. Police Officer in Charge and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: (2006)3GLR2458
C.K. Buch, J.1. Heard. The Court is informed that the police has now filed charge-sheet. It is prayed for by the petitioner that looking to the nature of injury found on the body of person injured, namely Zahir Abbas, the police was required to register the offence punishable under Sections. 307 and 326 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code mentioned in the complaint registered with Bavla Police Station. The learned A.P.P., is not sure whether the police has charge-sheeted the accused persons for such offences or whether the accused have been charge-sheeted for the offences punishable under Section 307 and/or 326 of the Indian Penal Code or not.2. In response to the query raised by the Court, Ms. Saita Raju, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-accused, has fairly submitted that as per the instructions received by her, the police has not charge-sheeted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 307 and/or 326 of the Indian Penal Code. One copy of the injury cert...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›