Gujarat Court March 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rekhaben Yogendrakumar Maniar Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-01-2004
Reported in: I(2005)DMC85
C.K. Buch, J.1. Heard learned advocate appearing for the petitioner. Other side, though served, is not present. It is submitted by learned advocate Mr. Mukesh A Patel appearing for the petitioner that on earlier occasion the respondent No.2 Husband Yogendra Kumar Maniar, when appeared, had expressed his wish to place written submissions on the record of the Court and he does not want to engage any advocate. A written reply prepared by the respondent No.2 husband was to be tendered with the registry and copy of which was also to be supplied to the office of Public Prosecutor. I am told that a copy in the office of Public Prosecutor was tendered as State of Gujarat is also a party. Mr. I.M.Pandya, learned APP confirms that the copy of the contentions raised by the respondent No.1 was submitted in the office of Public Prosecutor and the office is having copy of the same. Whether the original was ever tendered to the registry or not, is not a question, because the same is not available on ...
Poul Cyril Parmar Vs. District Education Officer
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-01-2004
Reported in: (2004)2GLR482
Akshay H. Mehta, J.1. As these six petitions involve a common question of fact, pertaining to interpretation of the direction given by the Division Bench of this Court (Coram : M.R. Calla, N.G. Nandi, JJ.) vide judgment dated 31st July, 2001 rendered in Letters Patent Appeal No. 788 of 1998 in Special Civil Application No. 3635 of 1982, they have been heard together and now they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. To appreciate the controversy involved in this group of petitions, it would be necessary to state certain facts. Special Civil Application No. 3635 of 1982 was preferred by teacher of the Non Government (Private) and Grant-in-Aided school which was run by Education Board of Baroda Methodist Church, Gujarat Conference in Southern Asia, now run by Methodist Church in India with effect from 1st August, 1858. Her grievance in the said petition was that though she had opted for pension, the same was denied to her on the ground that pension scheme was not applicable to...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›