Gujarat Court August 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shrijee Trading Company and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: (2003)3GLR2331; (2003)4GLR950
R. K. Abichandani, J. 1. All these appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 4th December, 2002 made by the learned single Judge in a group of petitions in which the petitioners challenged the action of the State Government of deciding not to renew under Rule 5 of the Gujarat Essential Articles (Licensing, Control & Stock Declaration) Order, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Licensing Order of 1981'), the licences of wholesale kerosene dealers, who were not the agents/dealers of the Oil Companies, from 1-8-2002, and seeking a direction on the respondents to renew the licences of the petitioners as wholesale dealers in kerosene for a period of five years from the date of their applications for renewal with consequential and incidental orders. The petitioners challenged the provisions of Amendment Order, 2002 made on 31-7-2002, by which definition of 'Public Distribution System Kerosene Wholesale Dealer' was added as per Clause 2(18A) in the Licensing Order, 1981, and...
Narayanbhai Pannabhai Solanki Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2004CriLJ1701
A.L. Dave, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a judgement and order rendered by Additional Sessions Judge, Sabarkantha at Himmatnagar, on 12th September, 1995, in Sessions Case No.20 of 1994. The appellant was the accused before the Sessions Court and was tried for offences punishable under Sections 366, 376, 302, 201 and 363 of Indian Penal Code. He came to be convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 363 of IPC. He was ordered to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month, for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC. He was ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month, for the offences punishable under Section 201 of IPC, and was also ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay fine of Rs. 200/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month, for offence puni...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›