Gujarat Court April 2002 Judgments
Regional Director, E.S.i. Corporation Vs. Patel Printing Press
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-02-2002
Reported in: (2003)4GLR126; (2003)IIILLJ647Guj
K.M. Mehta, J.1. The Regional Director, E.S.I. Corporation appellant, original opponent, has filed this First Appeal under Section 82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against judgment and award dated April 27, 2001 passed by the E.I. Court in E.S.I. Application No. 80 of 1989. The learned judge by the impugned judgment quashed and set aside demand letter dated May 4, 1989 claiming Rs. 2,19,245/- Insurance amount on the cost of construction and profit of contractor under Section 2(22) of the Act.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as under:Patel Printing Press, respondent, original applicant was carrying on business at Ahmedabad. The respondent has its own building where it carries on business of printing press. It is the case of the respondent that it has one building and another it has acquired which was originally rented to the tenant. However, the building was in a dilapidated position and therefore it decided to renovate the same ...
Tag this Judgment!Chandravadan Chunilal Shah and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-01-2002
Reported in: AIR2002Guj416; (2002)3GLR1
D.S. Sinha, C.J. 1. Heard Mr. D. D. Vyas, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellants, Mr. A.Y. Kogje, learned A.G.P., appearing for respondent No. 1, Mr. B. S. Patel, learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and Mr. D. C. Dave, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No. 4, at length and in great detail.2. The instant appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment and order, dated 29-6-2001 rendered by the learned single Judge in Spl. C. A. No. 267 of 1997 between Chandravadan Chunilal Shah and Ors. v. State of Gujarat and Ors.3. By the impugned judgment and order, the challenge of the appellants to the Preliminary Town Planning Scheme No. 3, framed by Petlad Urban Development Authority, on the ground of lack of individual/personal service of notice under Section 52 of the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), has been turned down. The appellants being tenants of respondent No...
Tag this Judgment!Pino Bisazza Glass Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bisazza India Ltd. and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-01-2002
Reported in: (2003)1GLR528
Jayant Patel, J.1. Rule. Mr. P. M. Dave for respondent No. 1, Ms. Davawala for respondent No. 2 waive service of rule. With the consent of learned Advocates for the parties matter is taken up for final hearing.2. The present petition is filed by the petitioner against the order dated 26-9-2000 passed by the Regional Director, Western Region, Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs, Bombay, Govt. of India, the respondent No. 2 herein.3. Heard Mr. A. L. Shah for the petitioner, Mr. P. M. Dave for the respondent No. 1 and Ms. Davawala for respondent No. 2.4. Mr. Shah for the petitioner submits that the powers under Section 22 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') are in the nature of quasi-judicial powers, and therefore, it is obligatory on the part of the respondent No. 2 to record the reasons for passing the final order. Mr. Dave for the respondent No. 1 submits that the order speaks for itself, and in his submission, it is true that upon the representatio...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›