Gujarat Court December 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Girnar Stone Quarry Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-04-2002
Reported in: (2003)4GLR113
H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned advocate Mr. B.J. Jadeja on behalf of the petitioners and learned AGP Mr. A.D.Oza appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. Since common question of facts and law involved in this group of ten petitions, all these petitions heard together and the same are being disposed of by this common judgment. #. Learned advocate Mr. Jadeja appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that the respondent authorities have granted N.A. Permission respect of the land in question in favour of the petitioners for establishing quarry and thereafter land revenue for N.A. use was to be recovered at the rate of Rs. 0.06 ps. per sq. mtr. as stated in the order which is at Annexure-A to the petition. Thereafter, the Government of Gujarat by making amendment in Rule-81 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 has enhanced rates of the land revenue as per the Notification dated 8th April, 1992 as per the table given on page-3 of the petition. Thereafter, the State of Gujar...
Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Minor Prakash Ma ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-03-2002
Reported in: 2003ACJ1958; (2003)2GLR1334
B.J. Shethna, J. 1. The appellant-Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation and its driver Sabir Ismail Patel have challenged in this Appeal the impugned judgment and award dated 23-12-1987 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (main), Bharuch in M.A.C.Petition No. 711 of 1985 filed by the respondent-claimant Maganbhai Ashabhai Padhiyar for the personal injury caused to his minor son Prakash Maganbhai Padhiyar in a motor accident which took place on 7-10-1984.2. In the instant case, the accident in question took place on 7-10-1984 at 10-30 p.m. in which minor Prakash Maganbhai Padhiyar, hardly aged about 8 years old lost his left leg. He received various other injuries on his person. Claim Petition No. 711 of 1985 came to be filed in 1985 before learned Tribunal claiming Rs. 2,50,000/- by way of compensation. However, learned Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition and awarded only Rs. 1,53,750/- to the claimant with cost and interest on it. The appellants have challeng...
Rev. Father E.G. Kuriakose Cor Episcopa Vs. Father Thomas Myalil and o ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-03-2002
Reported in: (2003)2GLR1330
D.S. Sinha, C.J. 1. Heard Rev. Father E.G. Kuriakose Cor Episcopa, the petitioner, who is appearing in person, at length and in detail.2. By means of instant application, the petitioner urges this Court to initiate proceedings against the respondents and punish them for the alleged contempt of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Vadodara Division, Vadodara, as well as of this Court. He asserts that the order of this Court dated 18th September, 2001 passed in Special Civil Application No. 6615 of 2001, Rev. Father E.G. Kuriakose Cor, Episcopa v. Father Thomas Myalil, has not been complied with and has been disobeyed deliberately by the respondents. Further, assertion of the petitioner is that the respondents have disobeyed the order dated 4th October, 2001 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Vadodara Division, Vadodara, passed in Judicial Misc. Application No. 51 of 2001, Rev. Father E.G. Kuriakose Cor Episcopa v. Father Thomas Myalil, and Shri A.M. Mathew.3. By its order dated 18th S...
Kasam Lakha Sama Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-02-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ2959; (2003)1GLR376
Akshay H. Mehta, J. 1. In this appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Kutchh at Bhuj in Sessions Case No. 75 of 1992 which was tried along with Sessions Case No. 89 of 1998. The appellant has been convicted for committing offence made punishable under Section 3(1)(b)(c) of the Official Secrets Act and he has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of 14 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default further RI for 3 years. 1.1. The appellant is the original accused of Sessions Case No. 75 of 1992. The other original accused of that case, namely Junas Dosal Sama has been acquitted by the learned trial Judge of the offences with which he was charged. Similarly, the learned Judge has also acquitted original accused of Sessions Case No. 89 of 1998, namely Ismail Mahmed Sama of the offences with which he was charged. Both these cases have been disposed of by the learned t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›