Gujarat Court September 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Navsarjan Trust Vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-05-2001
Reported in: AIR2002Guj243; (2002)1GLR482
B. C. Patel, J.1. Rule. Mr. M. G. Nagarkar waives service of rule. At the request of the learned Advocates, this matter is taken for final hearing.2. This is a glaring example where Public Corporation despite the service is affected much before has not bothered to file reply. In this session, we have come across several cases where the Government/the Corporation on account of delay, in almost all matters is required to file applications for condonation of delay. The same requires issuance of rule in delay applications. We are constrained to say that in number of cases where there is nothing on the merits yet the appeals have been preferred. Even the learned G.P./A.G.P. arguing the appeals in many cases, could not satisfactorily point out to the Court that the trial Court has committed any error, and therefore, without issuance of notice to the land losers, the matters have been rejected. After taking into consideration merits, in some cases where it was pointed out that interference is...
Mayurdhwajsinhji Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-05-2001
Reported in: [2002]253ITR621(Guj)
D.A. Mehta, J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'A', has referred the following two questions for the opinion of this court:'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that Darbargadh was an impartible estate and that the assessee was the holder of that estate under Section 4(6) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in directing the Wealth-tax Officer to include the same value of Darbargadh in the total wealth of the assessee when the valuation is under challenge by the assessee?' 2. The assessment years involved are 1966-67 to 1971-72 and the relevant valuation dates are March 31, 1966 to March 31, 1971, respectively.3. The assessee who is an individual claimed before the Wealth-tax Officer that the value of the building known as 'Darbargadh City Palace', should not be included in his net wealth in view of the fact tha...
Ram Shastri and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-04-2001
Reported in: (2002)1GLR262
J.R. Vora, J. 1. This Revision Application is directed against an order passed by learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Rajkot, on 19-2-2001, below Application of the present petitioners - Exh. 12, filed for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the Court concerned would not take the cognizance of the alleged offences under Sections 132 and 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, for want of required sanction. 2. The facts of the case go to suggest that the incident in question occurred on 11-1-1993 at city of Rajkot. The State of Gujarat was disturbed by communal riots everywhere. In Rajkot also at about 17-00 hours, near Dena Bank Chowk, a mob was gathered and a programme of burning effigy of leaders was arranged. However, to maintain the law and order, Police made strict bandobasi. There was a Notification under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code for the gathering of persons of more than 5 in number. When this mob, at the relevant time, gathered in the Dena Bank Chowk, the S...
Anarkali Sarabhai Vs. Commissioner of Gift-tax
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-04-2001
Reported in: [2003]259ITR97(Guj)
M.S. Shah, J.1. At the instance of the assessee as well at the instance of the Revenue, the following questions of law are referred to us for our decision in respect of the assessment year 1976-77 :At the instance of the assessee : '(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, exercise of power of appointment by the assessee was a transfer of the assessee's interest in the property under Section 2(xxiv)(c) of the Gift-tax Act making the assessee liable to tax under the Gift-tax Act (2) If the answer to question No. 1 is in the affirmative, whether the assessee by exercising the power of appointment regarding his interest in the property and naming the persons to whom the trustees of the original trust should transfer the property at a future date, became liable to gift-tax in this assessment year (3) Whether the expression 'in such manner' in Clause (1)(iii) of the trust deed did not empower the trustees to make a direct transfer to appointee trusts If it did so em...
Horst Kurves Gmbh Vs. Essar Oils Ltd.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-04-2001
Reported in: [2003]115CompCas801(Guj); (2002)2GLR1314
M.S. shah, J.1. Admit. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal has been finally heard over a period of two days and is being disposed of by this judgment.2. This appeal arises from the order dated April 24, 2001, passed by the learned company judge in Company Application No. 127 of 2001 in Company Petition No. 265 of 2000 by which the learned judge rejected the application filed by the appellant-petitioning creditor for a direction to the respondent-company to give inspection of certain documents and for production thereof.3. The main company petition i.e. Company Petition No. 265 of 2000 has been filed by the appellant for winding up of the respondent-company--Essar Oils Ltd. on the ground that the amounts due and payable by the respondent-company to the appellant have not been paid in spite of the deed of guarantee given by the respondent-company in favour of the appellant. It is the case of the appellant that in accordance with the contract dated June 25, 199...
Kanoria Dyechem Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-03-2001
Reported in: [2002]108CompCas620(Guj)
M.S. Shah, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner is challenging the coercive recovery of sales tax dues by the respondent-authorities, on the ground that in view of the pendency of the petitioner company's reference under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'SICA' for short), the respondents cannot make any coercive recovery.2. In response to the notice, on behalf of the respondents, affidavit-in-reply has been filed contending that when the petitioner is recovering sales tax from its customers there is no reason why the petitioner should be granted protection against the coercive recovery. In rejoinder, Mr. Kaji for the petitioner points out that as per the minutes of the proceedings drawn by the BIFR for the hearing held on January 3, 2001, cut-off date for crystallization of the dues of the company is fixed as June 30, 2001, and therefore, the petitioner cannot be required to pay up sales tax ...
Bharatkumar Gajanand Vyas Vs. Mahatma Gandhi Labour Institute
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-03-2001
Reported in: (2002)4GLR2958
P.B. Majmudar, J.1. Mahatma Gandhi Labour Institute, Ahmedabad, respondent No.1, has suspended the present petitioner on the ground that the petitioner went on hunger strike on 2nd October, 2000 by sitting at the front entrance of the institution as well as on the ground that he had refused to drive the vehicle of the Institution on 11.10.2000 on the ground that unless he was provided with Log Book, he will not drive the vehicle. On the aforesaid two grounds, the petitioner is placed under suspension since 13th August, 2000.2. The present petitioner is serving as a driver in the respondent No.1-Institution and he is a Class III employee of the said Institution. He is serving since last 16 years on the said post. The petitioner used to drive the vehicle attached to Mr.S. Chandrasekhar, the Director General of the Institution. in the past, the petitioner had addressed certain representations in connection with certain demands.One of such representations is annexed at page 20, Annexure `B...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›