Gujarat Court April 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Goyal Dipti Rajkumar Vs. Principal, Government Akhandanand Ayurved Mah ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-09-1996
Reported in: (1996)3GLR387
S.D. Shah, J.1. This petition filed by a student seeking admission to Post Graduate course of M.D. (Ayurved) to the pioneer institution of Ayurvedic education in the entire country, namely, the Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, represented through its Dean, has brought to the surface a very sorry, sordid and dismal state of affairs prevailing in the institution of higher education. So gross are the lapses and lack of coordination on the part of the Gujarat Ayurved Univeristy and the Principal of Government Akhandanand Ayurved Mahavidyalaya at Ahmedabad that this Court cannot help observing that even institution of higher education makes mockery of meritocracy and toss the life of the student to a stage of uncertainty and ultimately helpless student knocked the door of the Court of law for justice. The interference of this Court in the matter of admissions to any course in educational institution is a matter of dislike and is adversely commented upon by the Apex Court of the country...
Rajkot Municipal Corporation Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-04-1996
Reported in: AIR1997Guj46; (1997)2GLR1281
ORDERA.N. Divecha, J.1. The order passed by the Additional Mamlatdar for the City of Rajkot at Rajkot (respondent No. 3 herein) oh 12th March 1982 as affirmed in revision by and on behalf of the State of Gujarat (respondent No. 1 herein) by the order passed on 31st August 1982 is under challenge in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. By his impugned order, respondent No. 2 held one parcel of land bearing survey No. 625/626 admeasuring about 284 square yards (the disputed land for convenience) to be Government land and to have been encroached by and on behalf of one Reliance Construction Company through the present petitioner and ordered summary eviction therefrom and imposed fine of Rs. 5/- on the petitioner for such encroachment.2. The facts giving rise to this petition move in a narrow compass. It appears that the petitioner claimed to be the occupant of the disputed land on the ground of its vesting in the erstwhile Municipality of Rajkot, later on becoming...
Ashok Fashions Ltd. Vs. Meghdoot Acid and Chemicals
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-03-1996
Reported in: [1998]91CompCas655(Guj)
B.C. Patel, J.1. The appellant, Ashok Fashions Ltd., has filed this appeal against the order passed by the learned company judge on February 29, 1996, in Company Petition No. 25 of 1996 whereby the learned company judge, after admitting the company petition, has directed public advertisement on or before March 8, 1996, in the Gujarati daily Gujarat Samachar and the English daily Times of India. It is further ordered that the final date of hearing to be notified would be March 30, 1996. 2. The respondent herein presented a company petition before the learned company judge praying for winding up of the appellant-company as in spite of statutory legal notice under the Companies Act, 1956, calling upon the appellant to pay the principal sum of Rs. 1,69,290 together with interest thereon at the agreed rate of 24 per cent. per annum the company has failed to honour the same. In the company petition, the respondent herein made the following averments on oath : '2. The company above named, viz...
State of Gujarat Vs. Madia NitIn M.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-03-1996
Reported in: (1997)1GLR127
R.R. Jain, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 22-8-1994 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar releasing the respondent/accused on bail in C.R. No. 56 of 1994 for the offence under Sections 323, 504 and 506(2) of Indian Penal Code read with Section 3(10) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ('the Act' or 'Atrocity Act' for short hereinafter), State of Gujarat has preferred this petition under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code ('Code' for short hereinafter) for cancellation of bail.2. It is argued on behalf of the State that along with offences under Indian Penal Code the respondent was also charged for offence under Section 3(10) of the Act and by virtue of Section 14 of the Act, the offence under the said Act is exclusively triable by Special Court in the cadre of Session Court; hence, the Magistrate having no jurisdiction ought not to have entertained the bail application. It is not in dispute that along with ...
Patel Jividas Trikamdas and ors. Vs. Collector and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-02-1996
Reported in: AIR1997Guj121; (1996)2GLR688
J.N. Bhatt, J.1. Whether an illegal transaction or sale in contravention of the provisions of law could be questioned or revoked or can-celled after a lapse of several years is the heart of the present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.2. The petitioners had purchased the admeasuring 2 acres in block No. 1029/93 of village Dingucha, Tal. Kalol, Mehsana District from Respondents Nos. 3, 4 and 5 byregistered sale deed dated 6-6-68. Since then, according to the case of the petitioners, they are in possession of the said agricultural land and they have spent huge amount for the development and for taking crops every year.3. The respondent No. 1, District Collector, had initiated proceedings under the provisions of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1947 (Act) in the year 1987, i.e. after 19 years for declaring the aforesaid sale transaction as invalid being in violation of the provisions of the Act and show cause notice was issued. Thereafter the petitioners ...
Mohammad Kasam Bailim Vs. Officer on Special Duty, Land Acquisition an ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-02-1996
Reported in: (1997)3GLR2199
B.C. Patel, J.1. Rule in Special Civil Application Nos. 10722, 10762, 13299, 1330. 13301, 13302, 10761 of 1994. Mr. Amit Panchal, learned A.G.P. waives service of Rule on behalf of Officer on Special Duty and Mr. Nanavati waives service of Rule on behalf of Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. At the request of the learned Advocates for the parties, all the matters are heard today and are disposed of by this common judgment as the question involved in the matter is the same. The facts are taken from Special Civil Application No. 7126 of 1995.2. Facts: For establishment of an industrial estate in Bharuch district, respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the Collector or Special Land Acquisition Officer) issued a notification on 15-1-1982 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), for acquiring large area of land. After following the procedure laid down under the Act, the Collector declared an award under Section 11(1) of the A...
Oza Trikambhai Mohanlal Vs. Prajapati Mangaldas Shivram Through His He ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-02-1996
Reported in: (1997)1GLR426
S.D. Shah, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.), Unjha in Regular Civil Suit No. 236 of 1990 dated 2-2-1995. By the impugned order the learned trial Judge has refused to exhibit document at Exh. 85/6 which purports to be a writing or agreement executed between deceased Mangaldas Shivram and Mohanlal Joitaram Oza on 3-1-1969. Said agreement is executed on a stamped paper of Rs. 1.75 ps. During the evidence of witness Mohanlal Joitaram Oza being witness No. 2 for the plaintiff, in the examination-in-chief the said document dated 3-1-1969 was shown to the witness Mohanlal Joitaram Oza. Said witness deposed that he has signed below the agreement as well as another signature is that of deceased Mangaldas Shivram. He also stated that the said agreement was with respect to prohibition against putting up construction of lavatory on Otla. He also deposed that the said writing was acceptable to him as well as to deceased Mangaldas Shrivram. He also state...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›