Gujarat Court September 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Zaverchand Popatlal Sumeria and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-06-1995
Reported in: (1995)2GLR1733
B.N. Kirpal, C.J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the acquisition of land in villages Padana and Meghpar in Jamnagar District, under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the said Act'), for M/s. Reliance Petroleum Ltd. (Respondent No. 4).2. Briefly, stated, the facts are that the petitioners allege that they are agriculturists having land at the aforesaid villages Padana and Meghpar. It appears that M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. has made an application before, the Collector, Jamnagar District, to the effect that it needs land for setting up a refinery in Jamnagar District.3. It appears that the Collector, Jamnagar made certain inquiries and measurements of some lands were taken. On 22-1-1993, an agreement was entered into between Reliance Industries Ltd., and/or Reliance Refineries Pvt. Ltd., under Section 41 of the said Act. According to the terms of this agreement, the company was directed to pay Rs. 2.10 crores...
Dahyabhai Kalubhai Solanki Vs. Devine Intermediates and Chemicals and ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-04-1995
Reported in: (1996)1GLR729
D.G. Karia, J.1. Gujarat Pollution Control Board at Gandhinagar has preferred the present appeal through its Law Officer under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal rendered in Criminal Case No. 1193 of 1989 whereby the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad, under his order dated March 17,1993, acquitted the respondents-accused of the offences punishable under Sections 43 and 44 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'.2. The respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are the partners of Divine Intermediates and Chemicals, situated at Vatva in Ahmedabad. The respondent-firm has been manufacturing black chemicals in process of which different types of chemicals and water are being used. It is alleged that the respondent-Industry discharged trade effluent without purifying it, in the open gutter of G.I.D.C, ultimately flowing in the River Khari at village Vinzol and thereby...
Shaikh Asif Iqbal Bavamiya Vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporatio ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-02-1995
Reported in: (1996)2GLR106
1. Petitioner has approached this Court as his request for compassionate appointment has been rejected by the respondent-Corporation. As averred by th petitioner, his father, after his retirement as a police personnel, was serving at Mangrol S.T. Depot as a reliever watchman. Reading Annexure 'A', it becomes clear that since 1988, his father is relieved from the job due to old age. In 1988, the petitioner made an application to the respondent that considering the case set out in his application, he should be given appointment. It appears that in 1989, the petitioner got a job in the respondent-Corporation for a temporary period. On June 6, 1990, father of the petitioner died and thereafter, for the first time, on November 5, 1994, petitioner submitted an application for appointment on compassionate ground. Thereafter, he has made representations but ultimately his application appears to have been turned down. Hence this petition. 2. There is nothing in the record to show that the fathe...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›