Gujarat Court February 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamlaben K. Bhatt Wd/O. Keshavlal Dalsukhbhai Vs. the Competent Office ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-02-1995
Reported in: (1996)2GLR357
M.R. Calla, J.1. The petitioner's husband expired on 19th November 1968. The petitioner, i.e., widow of Shri Keshavlal Dalsukhbhai filed the declaration in Form No. 1 under Section 6 of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 ('the Act' for short) with regard to the land in question. The Deputy Collector and Under Secretary, Urban Land Ceiling, passed an order dated 21-4-1980. He took note of the exemption accorded under Section 20 of the Act, dated 9th May 1979, passed by the Revenue Department, Government of Gujarat, and found that the lands mentioned at item Nos. 1 and 2 in the order dated 21-4-1980 were exempted and the lands mentioned at item Nos. 3 to 8 were in the agricultural zone and the same were being used for agricultural purposes. On that basis, the Competent Authority was of the opinion that there was no necessity for making any further inquiry in connection with the form and the draft statement under Section 8 was not required to be prepared. Accordingly, the ord...
P.M. Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-01-1995
Reported in: (1995)1GLR837
K.R. Vyas, J.1. The petitioner, by way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has challenged the action of the respondents in not considering his case for promotion and absorption to Class II services of the State Government and has prayed to direct the respondents to consider his case for promotion to Class II services of the State Government on the basis of his position in the seniority list issued by the respondents from time to time showing positions of the employees working as Agriculture Officers, Grade I and to promote him with effect from the date his junior had been promoted to the Class II services with continuity of service and difference of salary.2. By way of interim relief, the petitioner prayed for restraining the respondents, their servants and agents from making further promotions of the officers junior to him to Class II services of the State Government. While issuing notice on the petition, ad-interim relief was granted by this Court. However...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›