Gujarat Court January 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Gujarat Vs. Harish Laxman Solanki
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-13-1994
Reported in: (1994)1GLR581
K.J. Vaidya, J.1. Two questions of quite great public importance baffiling this Court and perhaps many others day-in and day-out have arisen for consideration in this Office Objection matter. They are : Firstly, 'Whether in view of the hundreds and thousands of the accused who are found not traceable and absconding one after another, after their acquittals, and thereby not available to be served with the Warrants and/or Notices of this Court after the appeals/revisions are admitted against them, in the overall interest of justice, though there is no express provision in the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 on the point, this Court would be still justified in directing the sub-ordinate Courts to take bonds and bail-bonds from the concerned accused as well as their sureties, by way of security for the purpose of making them available to face not only the investigation and the trial proceedings but also the appellate one and thereby to take ultimate orders that may be passed against them?' A...
Bhil Ragnathsinh Vajesinh (Since Decd.) Through His Heirs and Lrs. Vs. ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-10-1994
Reported in: (1995)1GLR61
A.N. Divecha, J.1. The order passed by the Mamlatdar and Agricultural Lands Tribunal (Ceiling) at Kheda (the first authority for convenience) on 23rd April, 1981 in Ceiling Case No. 11 of 1976 (Kapadwanj) as substantially affirmed in appeal by the order passed by the Deputy Collector at Nadiad (the appellate authority for convenience) on 29th July, 1981 in Ceiling Appeal No. 23 of 1981 as further affirmed in revision by the decision rendered by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal at Ahmedabad (the Tribunal for convenience) on 14th February, 1984 in Revision Application No. TEN. B.A. 1081 of 1982 is under challenge in this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. By his impugned order, the first authority came to the conclusion that the holding of the petitioners herein was 83 acres 32 gunthas and it was in excess of the ceiling area by 11 acres 32 gunthas and declared in all 13 acres 16 gunthas to be surplus vesting in the State Government free from all encumbrances i...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›