Gujarat Court April 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raiyabhai Arjanbhai Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-02-1993
Reported in: AIR1994Guj62; (1994)1GLR16
ORDERR.A. Mehta, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated August 21, 1980 (Annexure D to the petition) passed by the competent authority. By that order, the petitioner's Form No. 1 has been finalised and out of the total holding of 1934.13 sq. mts. of land, the petitioner has been permitted to retain the land up to 1000 sq. mts. as per the ceiling limit for Ahmedabad urban agglomeration and 934.13 sq. mts. has been declared to be surplus land and a draft statement was issued on June 18, 1980. The petitioner filed his petition on July 13, 1980 and submitted that as there is electric grid line passing over the land, the land to the extent of 1027.24 sq. mts. was useless for any construction and, therefore, it cannot be treated as vacant land. The authority has rejected that contention.2. The petitioner submits that the order of the competent authority does not record any reasons; it is not a speaking order and, therefore, it is illegal. Secondly, it is submitted that under the ...
Trivedi Navinchandra Ambalal Vs. Rathod Budhabhai Bhaijibhai
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-02-1993
Reported in: (1994)2GLR1114
R.K. Abichandani, J.1. The petitioners have challenged the decision of the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal dated 23-12-1983 in Revision Application No. TEN/BA/70 of 1981 allowing the Revision Application and setting aside the orders passed by the Courts below it and issuing a direction to the Mamlatdar to hold an inquiry under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), in accordance with law.2. It appears that the respondent had made an application on 16-12-1979 to the Mamlatdar and A.L.T., Anand under Section 32FF of the Act, inter alia contending that the land bearing Survey No. 559/2 admeasuring 2 Acres 30 Gunthas situated in village Kunjrao, Taluka Anand was cultivated by him and his predecessors for more than 60 years on the basis of crop share basis and the land should be sold to him by fixing the purchase price under the Act. The application was rejected by the Mamlatdar and A.L.T. on 24-1-1960 and an appeal filed before t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›