Gujarat Court June 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjiv Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-22-1992
Reported in: AIR1993Guj132
ORDERG.D. Shah, J. 1. Rule was issued in this petition on 6th May 1992 and the learned Counsel appearing for the parties were heard at length and with the consent of the parties such hearing was treated as final hearing. Pursuant to such hearing following Judgment is rendered. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has moved this Court for issuance of a writ of mandamus against the State Bank of India for directing the State Bank to extend to the petitioner the benefits of Rehabilitation Scheme contained in its Circular dated 6th February 1987. 3. In order to appreciate the entitlement of the petitioner for extension of the benefits under the said Scheme it is necessary to refer to the relevant facts hereunder : The State Bank of India has sanctioned to the petitioner various credit facilities and as on 5th July 1990 amount of Rs. 29,40,588/-was due and payable by the petitioner to the bank. The respondent Bank has already instituted Civil Sui...
Mohanlal Jeram Mistry (Since Decd.) Through His Heirs and Lrs. Hemkunv ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-22-1992
Reported in: (1993)1GLR411
A.N. Divecha, J.1. Can the landlord be permitted to succeed in his design in getting possession of the suit permises by laying a trap for the tenant to fall into arrears of rent after refusing to accept money orders for rent sent by the tenant on previous occasions What is the mode of raising a dispute regarding the standard rent Is it necessary for the tenant to raise the dispute as to the standard rent of the rented premises afresh after service of the demand notice once he has raised it after service of the demand notice on the earlier occasion These are some of the questions arising in this revisional application preferred by the original tenant under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (the 'Rent Act' for brief) challenging the legality and validity of the judgment and the decree passed by the learned Assistant Judge of Jamnagar on 21st November, 1979 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 126 of 1976. Thereby the learned Appellate Judge was ple...
Hosing Ardasar Ichhaporiya Vs. Mahavir General Hospital and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-18-1992
Reported in: (1993)2GLR1394; (1994)IILLJ326Guj
Mehta, J. 1. The petitioner-workman is aggrieved by the order of the Labour Court, permitting the respondent-management to appear through Shri G.M. Vakil (a practicing Advocate) as an officer of the Southern Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The respondent-management is Mahavir General Hospital. That management initially wanted to be represented by Shri G.M. Vakil, Advocate and a Vakalatnama in his favour was filed. The petitioner-workman objected to the same and, therefore, he could not appear in the proceedings. Thereafter, by an application Ex. 19 it was contended that the respondent-management is an ordinary member of Southern Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry and that Shri G.M. Vakil is a patron member of the said Chamber, and that he has been coopted as a member of the Managing Committee thereof. It was, therefore, submitted that, he can appear and represent the employer in the present case as an officer of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The Labour Court acc...
State of Gujarat Vs. Dr. Maltiben Valjibhai Shah
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-18-1992
Reported in: (1993)2GLR1600
S.M. Soni, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 1071 of 1981 is filed by the State of Gujarat for enhancement of sentence imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mundra on accused No. 2 in Criminal Case No. 94 of 1980. Criminal Appeal No. 1188 of 1981 is transferred from the Court of Sessions to This Court in view of the enhancement appeal filed by the State being the appeal filed by the accused-respondent against the order of conviction of simple imprisonment for seven days and a fine of Rs. 1000 and in default simple imprisonment for one month on she being found guilty under Section 304A of Indian Penal Code.2. Heard learned A.P.P. Shri S.P. Dave for the State and Learned Counsel Mr. A.D. Shah for the respondent accused No. 2. Before adverting to diverse contentions raised by the parties in this appeal challenging the conviction and asking for enhancement, it will be relevant to refer to the facts of the case. The case has arisen from an unfortunate incident which took place in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›