Skip to content

Gujarat Court May 1992 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 04 1992

Hargovindbhai Prabhubhai Patel and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-04-1992

Reported in: (1993)2GLR1100

S.D. Shah, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the judgment and order of the State Government dated 12-2-1990 passed in exercise of revisional powers under Section 34 of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.2. The relevant facts giving rise to the present petition are as under:(i) One Prabhudas Jadav was the holder of land. He left behind him two sons, namely, (i) Hargovindbhai and (ii) Chimanbhai. Hargovindbhai had two sons, namely, (i) Bhikhubhai and (ii) Dineshbhai and Chimanbhai had three sons, namely, (i) Naginbhai, (ii) Shantilal and (iii) Hashmukhbhai. On the death of Prabhudas Jadav the properties came to be mutated in the name of Hargovindbhai and Chimanbhai.(ii) On coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act', both Hargovindbhai (petitioner No. 1) and Chimanbhai (petitioner No. 2) filed statements under Section 6(1) of the said Act and notices came to be issue...


May 01 1992

Maganji Govindji (Since Decd.) Through His Heirs and Lrs. Vs. Competen ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-01-1992

Reported in: (1993)2GLR1808

S.D. Shah, J. 1. Rule. Mr. R.M. Chhaya, learned A.G.R waives service of rule. With the consent of the parties the matter is finally heard.2. By this petition the petitioners who are the heirs and legal representatives of deceased Maganji Govindji are challenging the order passed by Urban Land Ceiling Tribunal dated 5th July, 1989 in Ceiling Appeal No. 51 of 1988 confirming the order passed by Competent Authority, Surat dated 5th April, 1988.3. The facts giving rise to the present petition are as under:Deceased Maganji Govindji was the holder of parcels of land bearing Survey No. 68 admeasuring 4654 sq mtrs. and Survey No. 73 admeasuring 2934 sq. mtrs. at Jahangirabad and Rander of District Surat. He purchased the said parcels of land in the year 1938 by Registered Sale Deed. On coming into force of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 he filed statement under Section 6(1) of the said Act. In the said form he described the property as his own property and mentioned that no one ...


May 01 1992

Mahendra Shamaldas Soni Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-01-1992

Reported in: (1993)1GLR616

S.D. Dave, J.1. This Criminal Appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence pronounced by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 10, Ahmedabad, in Sessions Case No. 165 of 1985 dated 31-12-1985, convicting the appellant-accused for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 302 of I.P.C. and sentencing him to the R.I. for life.2. The appellant-accused, Mahendra Soni, along with three accused persons, namely, his father, mother and younger brother stood charged for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Section 302 of I.P.C. read with Section 34 or Section 114 of the I PC. Alternatively, the accused persons also stood charged for the alleged commission of the offence punishable under Section 498A of the I.P.C. Lastly, the accused persons stood charged for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 201 of I.P.C. on the accusation that with the intention of causing the evidence of murder to disappear, certain fa...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial