Gujarat Court October 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Fire and Genl. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Naniben and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-07-1992
Reported in: 1993ACJ838
Y.B. Bhatt, J.1. The present appeal arises from the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Main) at Bharuch in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 248 of 1979. The present appeal is by the insurer of the vehicle involved in the accident from which the claim arose The respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are the original claimants, whereas respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are the driver and the owner respectively of the car involved in the accident.2. It is pertinent to note at this stage that the appellant (hereinafter referred to as 'the insurer') has not challenged the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal; but has challenged its liability to meet the award in question. It is also pertinent to note that no other party, viz., the claimants, the owner or the driver has filed any appeal challenging the award in question nor filed any cross-objections in the present appeal.3. The pertinent facts, in brief, leading to the claim petition and the present appeal are as under:...
ilaben Wd/O. Dipakkumar Dhanraj Shah Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-07-1992
Reported in: (1993)2GLR1148
M.S. Parikh, J.1. Rule. Service of rule waived by Mr. M.A. Bukhari, learned A.P.P. for the State. Mr. R.R. Marshal, learned Advocate is permitted to make submissions on behalf of the complainant.2. By this petition the petitioner, a woman aged about 36 years has prayed for enlarging her on bail in respect of the case registered at C.R. No. I 302 of 1992 for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120B and 114 of the Indian Penal Code for having killed or having participated in the killing of her husband-Dipakkumar Dhanraj Shah.3. The petitioner in the first instance moved a Criminal Misc. Application No. 871 of 1992 before the Sessions Court at Surat. The learned Sessions Judge by his order dated 28-8-1992 rejected the bail application moved by the petitioner. She, therefore, approached This Court as stated above. Both the applications, namely, the application before the Sessions Court at Surat, as also before This Court, came to be filed during the pendency of the investigati...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›