Gujarat Court July 1990 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kantibhai Parmabhai Vankar and ors. Vs. District Superintendent of Pol ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-07-1990
Reported in: (1990)2GLR1259
R.A. Mehta, J.1. The appellants-original petitioners were called for selection by the District Employment Officer, Sabarkantha for preparing a select list for appointment to the posts of Armed Police Constables, on 3-8-1987 and they were subjected to physical test, checking of testimonials, written test and oral interview from 22-12-1987 to 24-12-1987 and all the appellants were selected. All the appellants has passed Standard VI examination as required by Rule 3(b)(i) of Constables (Armed Branch, Unarmed Branch and Women Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1979 framed under Section 5(b) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. None of them have passed S.S.C. Examination. Out of this list, 42 candidates were appointed in the month of February, 1988 and thereafter the selection list was not operated or utilised till 19-8-1988 and on 20-8-1988, 15 more candidates were appointed from the select list. These 15 candidates were the persons who had passed S.S.C. Examination and the persons who had not passed S...
B.K. Shukla Vs. Natverlal Ratanji Kevat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-03-1990
Reported in: AIR1992Guj57; (1990)2GLR495
Gokulakaishnan, C.J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dismissing the Special Civil Application filed by the Appellant herein. Chief Officer of Billimora Nagarpalika came forward with Special Civil Application No. 822/83 questioning a resolution passed by the Municipality by 2/3 majority under Section 48 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act dismissing him from the post of Chief Officer. The learned single Judge of this High Court after considering all the points raised by Mr. Raval, learned counsel appearing for the appellant herein, dismissed the special civil application and hence this letters patent appeal has been filed.2. Mr. Raval, learned counsel appearing for the appellant raised five contentions before us. The first contention is that the President of the Nagarpalika has no power to issue charge-sheet against the appellant herein. Since the Municipality is the appointing and removing authority as per the provisions of the statu...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›