Gujarat Court November 1990 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maneklal Kantilal and Company Vs. Shavarlal Harjivandas and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-06-1990
Reported in: AIR1991Guj143; (1991)2GLR748
1. (6-11-1990) The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad in Insolvency Petition No. 16 of 1965 by invoking the aids of the provisions of S. 75 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 ('Act' for short hereinafter).2. The material facts leading to the rise of the present appeal may be narrated at the outset so as to appreciate the merits of the appeal and challenge against it.3. The present appellant is the original petitioner who instituted the aforesaid Insolvency Petition against the present respondents, who are the original opponents. The parties are hereinafter referred to as 'petitioner' and 'opponents' respectively for the sake of convenience and brevity.4. The petitioner is a firm dealing with jaggery business. The said petition came to be filed by a creditor, the petitioner firm, against the opponents, contending that in the course of the business between the parties, a sum of Rs. 1,14,000/- had be...
ishwarsinh M. Rajput Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-05-1990
Reported in: (1990)2GLR1365
M.B. Shah, J.1. In these petitions, the question, which requires determination, is whether a person convicted under the Provisions of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Narcotics Act') can be released either on parole or furlough by the concerned authority under Parole and Furlough Rules after addition of Section 32A in the Act? Section 32A reads as under:32A. No suspension, remission or commutation in any sentence awarded under this Act:Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force but subject to the provisions of Section 33, no sentence awarded under this Act (other than Section 27) shall be suspended or remitted or commuted.This Section came into force with effect from 29th May, 1989. It is mandate of the aforesaid section that notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or any law for the time being in force no sentenc...
Yusufbhai Noormohmed Nandoliya Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-05-1990
Reported in: (1992)2GLR1581
S.B. Majmudar, J.1. The petitioner who is occupant of two survey numbers 864 and 687 of village Samalpati in Patan Taluka of Mehsana District has brought in challenge the orders passed by respondents refusing to hold that land acquisition proceedings qua these lands have lapsed as award under Section 12 of the Land Acquisition Act has not been passed qua these lands within two years from the date of declaration of Section 6 notification. A few dates relevant for this challenge may be noted at the outset. The petitioner's aforesaid two lands alongwith lards of other occupants were put in acquisition by the State of Gujarat-respondent No. 1 for the purpose of North Gujarat University which was to be established at Patan. Section 6 notification was issued on 12-5-1988. We may take it that it was also published in the locality round about that time. The learned Advocate for the petitioner stated that such publication took place somewhere in June 1988. The petitioner challenged this Section...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›