Gujarat Court January 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
i.S. Sindhi and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-09-1989
Reported in: (1989)2GLR999
P.M. Chauhan, J.1. Petitioners - Junior Clerks, Senior Clerks, Sub-Accountants, etc. - eligible for promotion to the post of Sub-Inspector of Prohibition and Excise, under the Inspector of Prohibition and Excise and Sub-Inspector of Prohibition and Excise (Recruitment) Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Recruitment Rules of 1973') in the Prohibition and Excise Department of State of Gujarat, have by this petition challenged the appointment of the direct recruits as Sub-Inspectors of Prohibition and Excise. According to the petitioners, the Director of Prohibition and Excise, respondent No. 2 who is the appointing authority, has not followed the rules providing quota between the direct recruits and the promotees in the ratio of 1: 3 and has also tried to introduce the manner and method of promotion by holding written and viva voce test even though no such provision is made in the said rules. They have also prayed for declaring the appointment of the direct recruits to the post of ...
Hamildbhai Usufbhai Patel Vs. the Director of Municipalities, Ahmedaba ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-07-1989
Reported in: AIR1989Guj237; (1989)2GLR247
ORDER1. As per order dated December 3, 1988, the petition has been rejected stating that reasons will be recorded later on Nov the reasons for rejecting the petition are stated herein below 2. Petitioner is a Councillor of Jambusar Municipality. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are also councillors of the said Municipality. Respondent No. 3 is the son of respondent No. 4. Wife of respondent No. 3, Smt. Jayshriben Shah is serving as teacher in the school run by the Municipality and she receives salary from the Municipality as teacher. It is contended by the petitioner that wife of respondent No. 3, and respondents Nos. 3 and 4 who are councillors of the Municipality are staying together and are messing together under the same roof and that they are members of the same family. Therefore the petitioner submitted an application before the Collector, Bharuch, respondent No. 2 herein, praying that respondents Nos. 3 and 4 have incurred disqualification specified in S. 11(2)(c) of Gujarat Municipaliti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›